Hello! I want to complain about user called Peja Mapping. He is removing result on Battle for koshare, where i put that was inconclusive and Yugoslav tactical victory, i also put source. I don’t think that Peja Mapping understand what was point of the battle. He is also saying that he have sources that it was KLA tactical Victory even tho point of Battle was not to capture Outpost But rather to break the border which KLA didn’t succeed Duplexz090 (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I suggest you have a read of WP:DR, and use the avenues suggested there, starting with the article talk page, focussing on what the reliable sources say about the outcome rather than what you or others think the outcome should be. If edit-warring is involved, then don't engage. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I totaly agree that we should put source rather than what we think, which i did of cource. I put link from Italian site saying that Battle of Koshare was on stragetic level inconclusive but tactically Yugoslav Army had better results, we solved problem with Peja Mapping and my edit was bring back but now new problem came, the user who goes by the name Azphalt is changing results without explanation claiming that source is not reliable. I saw in his Talk page that he was putting his point of view on article Ghegs rather than giving source. Duplexz090 (talk) 23:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

G'day. I would concentrate on what academic books (like those by Tim Judah and others) on the Kosovo War say, not websites. With controversial matters such as Kosovo, academic sources are best. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is there isn’t Many books outside of Serbian or Albanian talking about koshare Duplexz090 (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If that is really the case, and assuming they have differing perspectives on the battle, it would be better to avoid putting anything in the infobox and contrast the different views in the last para of the lead (and also in the body with citations). That is how we handle differing views of outcomes. There is rarely one true version of such things, they are usually nuanced. I certainly would avoid the formulation "strategic this but tactical that", from a military perspective things need to be placed in context and are rarely black and white. Good luck with it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! But here is same problem with the same person, Apparently Peja Mapping false accused me that im Duplexz1256 only Because we share similar name, he got Mad Because me and Red Spino were fixing his mistakes Because Peja Mapping put some source that dosen’t really even do with that article which means he dosen’t read what he is putting. Reaason for his false claiming is because he wants me to get banned from wikipedia since i don’t allow false claims and i read every source before i put them od remove them. Please solve this cheers! Duplexz090 (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Peacemaker67! Ive recently red these accusations made by Duplexz. Firstly he has been banned from wikipedia for sockpuppetry. Secondly i would like to "protect myself" from Duplexz's accusation. I had a discussion with him [here], if you are interested i would recommend reading it. All the best! Peja mapping (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good day @Peacemaker67 (sorry if bothering you) I would like to say that Duplex090 did nothing wrong to be falsely accused, he added sources for pages while Peja mapping removed the source that we added. I don't have a problem with him making KLA victory pages, but he can't without reason accuse Duplexz090 and vandalize pages just for them not say Yugoslav victory. Red Spino (talk) 23:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).

Administrator changes

• Arcticocean
• Wugapodes

Euryalus

CheckUser changes

• Firefly
• L235

Oversighter changes

• Firefly
• Guerillero
• L235
• Moneytrees

Technical news

• Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
• A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.