Hello, I'm Hamza Ali Shah. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Mr. Men Show (1997 TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Hamza Ali Shah  ^Talk 17:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mr. Men and Little Miss. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sahaib (talk) 21:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Making Fiends (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Blue's Big Musical Movie. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit war is unintentional. The user was leaving the plot of the movie incomplete and kept making it so Little!cequeen842 (talk) 02:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot sections are incomplete by design. They should not be larger than 700 words, per WP:FILMPLOT. I use one of the free available online word count tools to keep track of my plot summary work. Binksternet (talk) 02:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I can see the problem. Too much information to describe the special but if it's left as it is, it will not make sense to the reader. I have an idea. Check it out. Let me know if it's acceptable Little!cequeen842 (talk) 15:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Binksternet (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to List of Garfield characters, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dwayne Hill, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Colleen O'Shaughnessey, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 01:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Susan Roman, you may be blocked from editing. please see WP:DOB Waxworker (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dragon_Tales&oldid=1177855149 without a source. I reverted it because it's very common for people to make up characters and add them to articles about children's TV shows and i wanted to be on the safe side. It looks like you've been told lots and lots of times on this talk page to cite your sources. 23.244.50.54 (talk) 08:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vincent Tong (voice actor), you may be blocked from editing. Please see WP:BURDEN, please note the warnings on your talk page and stop adding unsourced content to articles Waxworker (talk) 07:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to 2012 (film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]