Hi. When you recently edited Roughing the kicker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Blocking below the waist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chop block (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Wide left, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Field goal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wide left is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wide left until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So with all your talk about how if the title was changed, opposition would cease and that everyone's problem was just with the title and not the content, you went ahead with a redirect? Can you please CSD it yourself so we don't have to go through another week of XfD? Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 20:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And now you have moved the redirect to a title that no one will ever search for, which defeats the purpose of a redirect. Would you mind stopping the pointy edits? Can you please just let this go? This whole thing is becoming disruptive... Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 18:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wide left. Since you had some involvement with the Wide left redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:19, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Billy Cundiff's missed kick at end of 2012 AFC Championship game. Since you had some involvement with the Billy Cundiff's missed kick at end of 2012 AFC Championship game redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruption. Compromising redirect discussions by moving the page being discussed is counterproductive and ill-advised. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did not at all compromise this discussion. I did everything I could to leave the page with the original notice leading to the discussion. At most, it may have been absent for 30 seconds, but this was for technical reasons, and then I put it right back. Hellno2 (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harbaugh Bowl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbaugh Bowl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of User Hellno2/Harbaugh Bowl, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Harbaugh Bowl. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hellno2/Wide Left (currently a redirect, but article is in history), and User:Hellno2/Harbaugh Bowl. thanks, Black Kite (talk) 19:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Old car. Since you had some involvement with the Old car redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Answer (sports) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article on an unnotable concept in sports. Basically states that sometimes teams score straight after the other one does.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 13:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Answer (sports) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Answer (sports) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 19:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a distinction between effectively eliminated (when a team is unable to reach the playoffs) and when a team is "officially eliminated" defined as when their magic number goes below zero? Please see: Talk: 2012 Toronto FC season. This debate may interest you. Nlsanand (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Angelica Marroquin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crawl space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Hellno2. I have moved Harbaugh Bowl to Harbaugh Bowl (disambiguation), and redirected the original title to Super Bowl XLVII. There is no need to create disambiguation pages having only two pages; such situations can be handled with a hatnote, per WP:TWODABS. Also, there is no need for a disambiguation page at a titles for which there is a clear primary topic. See WP:PRIMARY. If you wish to contest this change, please discuss by proposing your preferred revision through Wikipedia:Requested moves. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:19, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on Wikipedia:"Murder of" articles. It is something I could see being promoted to a style guideline at some point. Cheers! Location (talk) 20:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Hellno2 (talk) 23:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Hellno2: For your particularly fine contribution to Wikipedia in developing and maintaining Wikipedia:"Murder of" articles, and in appreciation of your hard work, you are awarded the Original Barnstar. -- Jreferee (talk) 13:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Hellno2 (talk) 04:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of I (Almost) Got Away With It episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of I (Almost) Got Away With It episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albertson's (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of I (Almost) Got Away With It episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Guanajuato, Mexico and Joyride (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of I (Almost) Got Away With It episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barrett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just added this summary in S5Ep11, but it is real short and summary is incomplete because I searched respective criminals but couldn't find much info, especially about Donna Schatz. In Schatz part, I don't know what leads ups between her assault and vacation home break-ins and between that and her arrest. So when you get a chance, can you find some important info and fill in missing events. PlanetStar 02:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The summaries I have added have occurred after I have watched the respective episodes. I don't have access to every single episode. I did watch that one, but it was some time ago, and I don't completely remember it. I have not written all the summaries myself; other people have written some. Hellno2 (talk) 01:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I sometimes think that you write the summaries after you watched respective episodes. I saw this episode before, but it was so long ago that I don't remember. For example, I refreshed my mind that a woman used a little girl to carry out crimes by reading a brief summary from a website. You see, I write summaries for season 6 episodes, based on what I learned by watching them. I watched all season 6 episodes (so far since there's just eight episodes while other seasons have 13 or 14 episodes), but I left couple episodes blank because I either didn't get a chance to write it or my mind is not freshed up. But seasons prior, I looked up websites about respective criminals that appeared on the shows, find important facts and add to summary, plus a little from I remembered from what I watched before. PlanetStar 02:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I do. I watch the full episode, then write the summary when it is fresh in my mind. Hellno2 (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prison escape, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dummy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of I (Almost) Got Away With It episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juarez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of I (Almost) Got Away With It episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joyride and Keith Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:BTPlaza.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure you'll get this anytime soon since you appear to be inactive right now. I, too, had been inactive over the past year, so I did not see Wikipedia:"Murder of" articles until recently. I wanted to let you know that you did a great job on it. I think it should be promoted to a guideline, or at least incorporated into the relevant section in Wikipedia:Notability (people). I would certainly be willing to assist in that endeavor if you attempt to do so. Cheers! Location (talk) 07:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Caleb Hughes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~~JHUbal27 05:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, friend. I am not sure who created Lists of resignations without looking further, but perhaps it was you. If so, I just wanted to let you know its deletion is being discussed. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You're invited to a discussion of at Talk:Involuntary termination of employment#Renaming back and rewriting. You're being notified because you have been active in choosing the direction of that article in the past; it now appears to now be duplicating Dismissal (employment). --Closeapple (talk) 09:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of Unusual Suspects episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Toddst1 (talk) 21:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I notice in Category:Capital murder cases the category is for cases in which the perpetrator is sentenced to death, but some states like Texas have a "capital murder"-named statute, but this can result in a life sentence, and if the perpetrator was under 18 at the time of the crime, it must mean a life sentence. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:ForeResSign.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Digitalspeed.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1977 Arizona armored car robbery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced forever, WP:SENSATIONAL coverage of WP:NOTNEWS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBL (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1977 Arizona armored car robbery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1977 Arizona armored car robbery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JBL (talk) 14:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Equipment violations. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 6#Equipment violations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 00:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playoff berth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playoff berth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TOA The owner of all ☑️ 01:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prohibited activities on public transport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prohibited activities on public transport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–dlthewave ☎ 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LocalLink 80 (BaltimoreLink) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LocalLink 80 (BaltimoreLink) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   05:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]