Happy First Edit Day, Favre1fan93, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Favre1fan93! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Talk:Thunderbolts* several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Thunderbolts*, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. You're welcome to change project specific ratings, but edit warring for an article that is clearly in better shape than C is not appropriate. This is what WP:MILHIST often does (project specific rating). By all other metrics, it and the other article you're edit warring over are clearly in better shape than you're indicating with your incorrect ratings changes. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: I reverted because the assessment is incorrect. What does WP:MILHIST have to do with a feature film? Even though I stated in my revert why I was (because of WP:FILM assessment, the primary project covering these articles), I subsequently provided additional links to inform you of such reasoning: WP:FILMA and WP:FILMA/B. This is quite clear that this fails B rating per the guidelines WP:FILM has formed, and thus is the consensus. Your change was against this consensus. While I agree with you that these articles look like B articles, they are not because they are missing some pretty key points: a plot section and critical response section. Thus, we can't considering them as having "no major omissions" as the B criteria checklist tells us should be there. I hope you'll go back and restore these assessments yourself. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Hey man im josh, I don't see why we would base film articles off of military history articles considering these are different subjects and WikiProjects that have their own criteria to meet B-class (which is not a universal standard). I agree with Favre that, while these articles are very well-developed to warrant being B-class, they lack sufficient details that would qualify them entirely as B-class film articles, as Favre outlined. These 3 Marvel films in particular are only one-to-six months out from release, so its not like these won't eventually become B-class ready in the near future once plot details and reception are available. I don't think either party ought to be edit warring over class ratings. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have also started a discussion about assessment at WT:FILM, noting about the changes to these two articles. You can find that discussion here. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]