Hello, Chrisbroad34, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Abdul Razaque, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 11:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Abdul Razaque.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Abdul Razaque.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Dr. Abdul Razaque.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chrisbroad34. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Abdul Razaque.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Razaque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Razaque until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabbobler (talk) 17:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not responding to your previous message in a timely manner. As a cancer survivor, I have been focusing on my health, which has caused some delays in my correspondence.

I have now resumed my editing activities, and I want to assure you that the information I provided on Wikipedia is accurate and verifiable. I also want to clarify that I do not have any personal relationship with Abdul Razaque. The edits related to him were made solely based on the relevance and accuracy of the information, ensuring it meets Wikipedia's standards.

Including accurate information about notable individuals like Abdul Razaque is essential for maintaining the quality and reliability of Wikipedia. If there are any concerns or further questions regarding the edits, please feel free to reach out.

Thank you for your understanding. Chrisbroad34 (talk) 18:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hamza Ali Shah. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Asim Munir (general) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Hamza Ali Shah  ^Talk 21:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your information is biased Chrisbroad34 (talk) 16:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing to address a concern related to the edits on the Wikipedia page for Asim Munir. It appears that some edits may be giving undue favor to Asim Munir, which could potentially affect the objectivity of the information presented.

As a platform dedicated to providing accurate and unbiased information, Wikipedia relies on adherence to strict guidelines that ensure the neutrality and verifiability of all content. It is crucial that any perceived favoritism or bias is addressed promptly to maintain the integrity of the platform.

Could you please clarify if there have been any edits that could be interpreted as giving personal favor to Asim Munir? If so, I would appreciate it if you could take the necessary steps to correct these edits and ensure that the information remains objective and factual.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response. Chrisbroad34 (talk) 18:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Saqib. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Daniyal Chaudhary have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Saqib (talk) 16:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniyal Chaudhary. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 16:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Daniyal Chaudhary, you may be blocked from editing. Saqib (talk) 10:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Daniyal Chaudhary. Saqib (talk) 18:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing to express my concern regarding recent edits on the Wikipedia page for Daniyal Chaudhary. It has come to my attention that some of the edits suggest a close personal relationship with Mr. Chaudhary, which may compromise the neutrality required by Wikipedia's guidelines.

Wikipedia is built on the principles of unbiased and verifiable information, and any form of favoritism undermines the integrity of the platform. I urge you to review the recent edits and ensure that they adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies on neutrality and verifiability.

Providing personal favors or biased information is against Wikipedia's guidelines, and I hope that corrective measures will be taken to maintain the credibility and neutrality of the content.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Chrisbroad34 (talk) 18:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry? Your AI generated reply is very vague. Could you try to give a clear, human answer that directly addresses the issue? — Saqib (talk) 19:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have concerns about recent changes that you are making in favor of Mr. Daniyal Chaudhary's Wikipedia page. You already know that he did not win the election based on honesty, and he has only succeeded in 47 forms, why are you hiding the truth? So, your edits indicate your close personal relationship with Mr. Chaudhary, which could jeopardize the objectivity that Wikipedia's principles demand.

Any kind of bias compromises the integrity of Wikipedia, which is based on the ideas of objective and verified knowledge. Kindly check your recent edits made in favor of Mr. Daniyal which prove your close contacts. It is against the policies of Wikipedia to provide biased or personal favors, and I hope that remedial action will be taken to protect the impartiality and trustworthiness of the content. Chrisbroad34 (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You seriously think I am writing in favor of Danyal Chaudhry? Just look at the BLP. And he won the election and is a member of Parliament. You need to provide a reliable source to prove your claims. — Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are giving favor. Thousands of media reports are available which demonstrate that gentleman (Daniyal) won election based on form 47. If you still insist on it that will prove your close ties with this gentleman. Chrisbroad34 (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do! — Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks gentleman. Chrisbroad34 (talk) 21:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Danyal Chaudhry. Per the article talk page: tendentious or otherwise irresponsible edits re contentious topics may result in a block. The talk page template was added by Daniel Case. JFHJr (㊟) 03:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]