I do not edit or contribute to any Wikimedia project on behalf of an employer, client, organisation, or any affiliated entity. Additionally, I neither receive nor seek compensation for my edits or contributions.
3-month backlog at AFC.
There are currently 2,566 pending submissions.
[view • purge • ]
Hey, I'm the ZyphorianNexus! I've only been "actively" editing Wikipedia for a couple of months, but I've been enjoying doing my bit and hoping to leave it a little better than I found it.
As for the name ZyphorianNexus? Let's just say it was just a random idea that popped into my head and stuck, and now it’s part of my Wikipedia identity.
I could make mistakes, but hey, we learn and discover something new as we go. Feel free to drop by my talk page if you need anything, or just want to say hi!
>Very low pending changes backlog: 2 pages according to DatBot as of 23:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
This barnstar is awarded to ZyphorianNexus for copy edits totaling over 20,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 5th Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to ZyphorianNexus for copyediting 2 long articles during the GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Longest Article, 3rd Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to ZyphorianNexus for copyediting one of the five longest articles – 9,306 words – during the GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Declined: This submission lacks adequate support from reliable sources / The references provided do not demonstrate that the subject meets the criteria for a Wikipedia article.
Wikipedia hosts articles only about notable topics with verifiable information, and the notability test is based on significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Without sources, an article cannot be created.
The sources should meet the following standards:
Reliable: Preference is given to secondary sources from reputable institutions with editorial oversight. Primary sources can be used for basic facts, such as a date of birth, but must be supplemented by solid secondary sources offering thorough analysis or interpretation.
Independent: Sources should be independent of the topic, such as not interviews with the subject, self-published materials, or content from the subject's own website.
Significant coverage: Your topic must be covered in detail in reliable sources. These sources should provide comprehensive discussion, analysis, or interpretation of the subject, rather than just basic facts or promotional content.
Multiple sources: At least three reliable, independent, secondary sources discussing the topic are typically required.
No original research: Articles should only summarise existing knowledge. Wikipedia is a tertiary source, not a platform for presenting new research. Avoid personal conclusions or analyses based on the sources.
If you cannot find substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, the topic does not meet our notability criteria and therefore does not qualify for an article at this time.
Declined: This submission does not reflect the formal tone expected for an encyclopedia article. / The submission seems to be more promotional than encyclopedic.
Articles on Wikipedia must be written in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. They should not advertise or promote the subject.
The writing should be:
Neutral: Articles must present a neutral point of view, refraining from taking sides, promoting, or criticising the subject. The content should be paraphrased or summarised from reliable sources without directly addressing the reader.
Non-promotional: Articles should avoid sounding like advertisements or press releases. Use plain, factual language without emotive words. The tone should be objective, as though reporting facts from a disinterested standpoint.
If your submission contains promotional language or biased content, it may be rejected or deleted.
Declined: The content lacks sufficient inline citations.
It is essential for biographical articles to have inline citations, with references to reliable sources supporting each fact (starting with basic information such as birth dates). Regardless of whether you're writing a biography, citations are required to allow readers and reviewers to verify content easily.
Biographies of living persons require inline citations to be accepted.
Rejected: This topic does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards.
Wikipedia only accepts articles about notable topics, evaluated using our notability criteria developed over time. "Notability" is not about popularity but about significant, independent coverage in reliable sources.
If your article was rejected for this reason, it means the topic is not yet notable enough for inclusion. Should new information become available that demonstrates the topic's notability, feel free to resubmit it for further review.
Rejected: This submission does not align with Wikipedia's purpose.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and can only host articles based on verifiable, reliable sources. It is not:
A place for original research, personal essays, or self-published content.
A platform to promote or advertise a topic, person, or product.
A social media site, discussion forum, business directory, or a catch-all for every subject.
