This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

1. User talk:2804:389:6028:9F91:F4B9:BC23:38AA:E6E0/sandbox for user warnings: nominated at MfD; notified 2804:389:6028:9F91:F4B9:BC23:38AA:E6E0 (talk · contribs) 14:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This isn't the example IPV6 address listed on the User warning sandbox. If anyone knows why this address also has a user warning
     sandbox, please enlighten us all? Unless there is some reason for this to be kept, it should be deleted to avoid confusion with the real one.
2. Extra Dimension v Kruger: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 11:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: as stated in the previous proposal for deletion it is not referenced, and there is no proof of notability. This is especially vital as the article also concerns (likely) living persons.
3. S v Chitate: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 12:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Relies on a single, primary source. Google search only turns up results for Wikipedia and its mirrors. It seems that this case is actually less notable than a Zimbabwean case of the same name in the High Court of Harare, which set precedents over several countries and has numerous results on legal databases. But for this article, it would be most appropriate to merge with Recklessness (law).
4. R v Smith (1900): nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Lacking sources, not likely to ever be expanded beyond what it is currently, and would be best off merged with Superior orders.
5. Ex parte Barton: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 03:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Legal case fails WP:GNG. No secondary sources, other similar named cases actually seem more notable than this one.
6. Ex parte Goldman: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG, based on a single primary source. Google only turns up results for Wikipedia and it's mirrors, then loses relevance without finding any secondary sources. No case to keep this one.
7. Ex parte Henning: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:52, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Legal case that fails WP:GNG. Based on a single primary source. Google only turns up WP and it's mirrors.
8. Ex parte Van Heerden: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 10:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Based on a single primary source. Google only shows up results for Wikipedia and it's mirrors, and no secondary sources. Another more recent case seems far more notable.
9. Blom v Brown: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 11:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Based on a single primary source. Google only shows up no secondary sources. May even overlap with BLP since it is likely that both parties of the case are still alive.
10. UPUSA v Komming Knitting: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 13:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG, lacks references and relies on a single primary source. Whilst Google returns several seemingly good results, closer inspection shows these to be no more than passing mentions, and the sources are usually more focused on south African labour law in general.
11. NUMSA v Bader Bop: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 04:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which seems to fail WP:GNG. Whilst based on a single primary source, it seems like other primary sources exist, but not any secondary coverage by other media outlets. Seems to have only had significance within the context of south African labour law, and was not a decision of any significance to the general populous. If it really should be mentioned on Wikipedia, it should be mentioned only breifly, as it was certainly not the first case to deal with the right to strike, and only one of some local significance.
12. Billiton Aluminium v Khanyile: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG, relies on a single primary source. Google shows only Wikipedia, it's mirrors and no coverage by secondary sources.
13. Daymon Worldwide v CCMA: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: WP:FORK of the Murray v Minister of Defence article. No unique content. No secondary coverage.
14. R v Khan (South Africa): nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG, relies on a single primary source, previous afd was closed keep, but I think it could be different this time. Two prior reasons for keep aren't valid any more:
      One was the similarity in names, as it previously had the same name as the R v Khan article but different punctuation so it was argued keep as an obvious redirect.
      Second was the argument that it satisfied WP:CASES. However that has since failed.
      I will ask the main keep !voter to weigh in, since they may be able to explain further how they considered it to meet GNG as they said at the time. Mako001 (talk) 09:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
15. S v Melani: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Totally unsourced, fails WP:GNG.
16. Ex Parte Boedel Steenkamp: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 16:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. Relies on a single primary source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar. The topic is not by itself notable, but anything useful here could probably be merged with Fetal rights.
17. S v Marx: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. Relies on a single primary source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar. Google shows no secondary sources.
18. R v Loubser: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. Lead section admits that it has "a very brief report", so the article is essentially admitting that it lacks notability.
19. Category:Transkei Supreme Court cases: nominated at CfD (CfD); notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Pointless category, only has a single item, and is highly unlikely to be expanded beyond this.
20. Gafin v Kavin: nominated at AfD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 10:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based only on primary sources. Google shows nothing relevant except Wikipedia and it's mirrors, and other primary sources. Also tried to find sources relating to Denise Kavin, but the results were for the S v Kavin case for the initial murder charges. It also reads concerningly like it was copied from a legal textbook or handbook.

1. Downton Brewery: nominated at AfD; notified Edwardx (talk · contribs) 16:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unfortunately this delightful little microbrewery seems to fail WP:GNG. A BEFORE search isn't turning up anything more than occasional passing mentions, and, since it had all its ad-fluff removed, its down to 2 sentences. Coup-de-grace?
2. Modica Group: nominated at AfD; notified Nz-stu (talk · contribs) 12:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Seems to fail WP:GNG. Limited news coverage, all but one item was for a single case where they loaned money to take over another company. Everything else is just directories and similar sites.

1. Interstate 43 (Milwaukee): nominated at RfD; Target: Interstate 43; notified JailBrokenIPODGoneWild (talk · contribs) 14:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Redirect for a very unlikely search term, as this is located entirely within Wisconsin.
2. Interstate 390 (Genesee Expressway): nominated at RfD; Target: Interstate 390; notified JailBrokenIPODGoneWild (talk · contribs) 14:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsure what the point of this redirect is, as Genesee Expressway already redirects to Interstate 390, this seems a vanishingly unlikely search term.
3. Khazar University Department of Political Science and International Relations: nominated at AfD; notified Faridakhazar (talk · contribs) 10:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG, very Advertisement-like, and it seems fairly pointless to have an article on a single department of a fairly minor university. Yes sure, Harvard has articles on its departments, but Harvard is Harvard, and this is not Harvard. The article relies entirely on sources from the university itself. If anything of this article is to remain, it should be merged into the main article on the university. This is also an unlikely redirect, so that wouldn't be suitable either.
4. Khazar English–Azerbaijani Comprehensive Dictionary: nominated at AfD; notified Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk · contribs) 11:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Reads like an advertisement, all sources are self-published. I don't really see why this translation dictionary is particularly notable. Might be able to be mentioned in the Khazar University article, but nothing more than a passing mention is needed.
5. Khazar University Dictionary and Encyclopedia Center: nominated at AfD; notified Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk · contribs) 11:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG, not in any way notable. Its main task is writing a non-notable translation dictionary. If anything should be kept, merge it with Khazar University, and delete this as an implausible redirect.
6. School of Economics and Management, Khazar University: nominated at AfD; notified Lsotova (talk · contribs) 10:18, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG, a BEFORE search isn't showing anything worthwhile. The article reads somewhat like an advertisement, and seems to have been just copied straight from their (13 year old) course information book. Kevo327 suggested that I take a look at these Khazar University articles, so any delete !vote from them should be considered as a co-nomination. If independent sources could be found for anything in this article, it should be merged and this deleted as it is of little use as a redirect.
7. Khazar University School of Humanities and Social Sciences: nominated at AfD; notified Faridakhazar (talk · contribs) 10:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:GNG, and a BEFORE search isn't looking good. It is full of advertising fluff, and is solely referenced to a source from the university itself. If any independent sources could be found, it should still be merged into the main Khazar University article, and this deleted as it is of little use as a redirect. Kevo327 recommended that I take a look at the Khazar University articles, so any delete !vote from them should be considered as part of the nomination.
8. Khazar University Library Information Center: nominated at AfD; notified Tzayseva (talk · contribs) 01:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: University library. Fails WP:GNG. BEFORE search turned up no independent sources. Delete entirely, no use as a redirect, and it would create circular links anyway.
9. Tofig Abbasguliyev: nominated at AfD; notified Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk · contribs) 02:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Originally PRODDED by Kevo327 with the rationale: Fails GNG, the only sources are one primary source (CV at the university which he worked at, said university probably did a paided editing campaign and has a lot of unnotable articles) and self published unreachable source. unnotable university professor who fail relevant notability criteria.
     I then moved it here, not because I disagreed with Kevo327s PROD, but since it is quite easy to get a prodded article back, and that isn't going to need to happen, since he will almost certainly never become any more notable.
     He fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG and all the other relevant standards. The article for the department he worked for has been AfD'd by myself due to non-notability. Also of no use as a redirect. Minimally linked to, and even by the articles from the university itself.
10. Khazar University Department of History and Archaeology: nominated at AfD; notified Faridakhazar (talk · contribs) 07:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails WP:GNG. BEFORE search turned up nothing usable. Sourced entirely to a book written by the university's founder. Also reads very advert-y. No use as a redirect, no usable content to merge either.
11. Kala Chashma: nominated at AfD; notified Neel.arunabh (talk · contribs) 12:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails WP:NSONG.
12. T. G. Sangram Singh: nominated at AfD; notified MrEccentric (talk · contribs) 07:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doubtful notability, most coverage seems to be related to the stamp paper scam, and the article seems to be devoted to countering that. It actually seems to come close to G11. It is largely unsourced. It is also full of irrelevant information, like details about some film that he apparently liked and how often he watched it, and details on the children of his adopted daughter. To say that it would need a rewrite would be quite accurate, and that's assuming that the subject is even notable. Anyway, I am calling for WP:TNT regardless of notability, to ensure that the current version cannot just be reverted back to.
13. Eurasian Academy: nominated at AfD; notified Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk · contribs) 07:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Made by a likely paid editor, and has been tagged for possible lack of notability for over five years. This, to some extent, continues the Khazar University series of AfDs (for those who have noticed them), and many of the same issues apply. All associated sources, very advert-y, and is probably pulled from some as-yet-unidentified copyright source. Fails WP:GNG, and I can't easily pick it out from other organisations with the same, or a similar name.
14. Maharram Gasimli: nominated at AfD; notified Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk · contribs) 08:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. BEFORE search is turning up only passing mentions and name lists, and no substantial coverage.
15. Isakhan Isakhanli: nominated at AfD; notified Gunel Mustafayeva (talk · contribs) 13:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Part of a group of articles created by paid editors some time (several years) ago, all connected to Khazar University. Sourcing is total rubbish, and is all to the University itself. If redirected, it should be TNT'd first.
16. Jabir Khalilov: nominated at AfD; notified Faridakhazar (talk · contribs) 13:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: More non-notable academics from Azerbaijan. Again, fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Sourcing is entirely to associated sources.

1. Aich Mollah: nominated at AfD; notified Mizanurrahmanhridoy.18 (talk · contribs) 12:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NSPORT. Prodded, but only one of several issues raised was addressed.
2. Ramayan (2022 Film): nominated at AfD; notified Okay Indi (talk · contribs) 11:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Prodded, but was removed without any reason given. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NFILM. Nothing significant shows up in a BEFORE search (for Ramayan Mitzoid, to avoid confusion with another film).

1. Nemet Qasimli: nominated at AfD; notified Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk · contribs) 10:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable. Fails WP:NBIO, and WP:GNG. Lacks sources, and was likely written in return for undisclosed payments.
2. Certified Arborist: nominated at AfD; notified Pechaney (talk · contribs) 11:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced, written to subtly promote "Certified Arborists" and demote mere "ordinary" arborists. Not notable enough on its own to warrant an article. If anything from this could be kept, it should be merged with either the ISA article or the arborist article. Whilst this is heading into G11 territory, it isn't quite there.

1. Travancore Engineering College: nominated at AfD; notified N nijaz (talk · contribs) 07:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails all relevant notability guidelines. The only independent reporting is on a single event where the college was in danger of shutting down: [1][2]. Google ran out of results before I found anything further. Searching for the colleges name in Malayalam wasn't much help either, with no significant coverage of the college. The article was less promotionally toned in the past, but that's not the real issue here, since it isn't notable.
2. Joe Bakaj: nominated at AfD; notified DinosaursLoveExistence (talk · contribs) 09:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails NBIO. Coverage is either: non-independent profiles; coverage of board appointments and retirements; coverage of other topics (Ford EcoBoost and Mazda MX-5) where they are mentioned as they were the one speaking to the reporters, or writing the press release. Also lacks sources.

1. Alessandro Orsini (sociologist): nominated at AfD; notified Alexmar983 (talk · contribs) 04:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Nominating on behalf of 85.211.232.197. IP placed deletion template on page using edit summary of "this Italian professor has no biography on the Italian wikipedia and he is not a relevant voice to be added". I waited a while to see if they would open a discussion, but they didn't, so I offered on their talk page to do it for them and they asked if I could.
     I don't have an opinion either way on if it should or shouldn't be deleted, but for a bit of background, this article was deleted back in 2016 due to a lack of notability, though things may (or may not) have changed recently. He has made some, er, "controversial" comments on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and has got some attention for those, but I'm not too sure that it allows him to get past WP:BLP1E, (although, on the other hand, there has been quite a bit of attention on him).
     Again, I don't have an opinion on it either way, so my part of the nomination shouldn't be taken as a delete.
     (Note: The multiple speedy deletions of this article under the local equivalents of G2,G3, G11 and G12 from it.wiki seems to have got some media attention.[3][4][5][6][7])
2. List of disc golf courses in Malaysia: nominated at AfD; notified Sirspinzalot (talk · contribs) 16:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Doesn't demonstate notability and isn't properly sourced, but more importantly, fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY, as it is essentially a re–presentation of the Disc Golf Association's directory of courses. The editor who wrote it is still learning the ropes, so the issues are understandable. To make it clear, the outcome I believe most appropriate is draftify but I don't want to go ahead and unilaterally draftify an NPP reviewed article.
3. Learning Planet Institute: nominated at AfD; notified IClemclem (talk · contribs) 13:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP. WP:BEFORE, runs out of relevant results before anything even remotely independent or reliable shows up for either its current or past name. Article is the focus of a large number of undisclosed paid editors as well, who don't seem to really give a hoot about our policies or anything.
4. Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2022/Britisth Rail Class 420: nominated at MfD; notified TheScottish801 (talk · contribs) 08:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: I just don't get how a mildly vandalised copy of a page is needed, or helpful. It's just vandalism, and it was a long time ago that the decision was made that stuff like WP:BJAODN was not appropriate for Wikipedia. I'd speedy it, but I am not certain that it meets G3 as it is (supposedly?) a "joke". I have got a fairly broad sense of humour, but I still don't see how this is funny. If they'd rewritten the whole article, maybe, but they haven't even gone past the lead.

1. Lim Kai Yi: nominated at AfD; notified Rightnowbabyimtorn (talk · contribs) 05:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Dismally fails WP:BEFORE search. The article is basically just a list of the (several hundred) minor speedsolving records that they hold. Not even close to notable.
2. Hans Heller: nominated at AfD; notified Jimjamjak (talk · contribs) 06:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Only source here is a YouTube video. A BEFORE search doesn't turn up much, and definitely not enough for notability to be established.

1. Shaykh Mahmudul Hasan: nominated at AfD; notified Tfrz.04 (talk · contribs) 10:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Prodded by Joe Roe, but de-PRODded without any reason given. Original reason for PROD was:
     Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO or the WP:GNG. Sources are primary, non-independent and/or trivial passing mentions.
2. Mee's Bus Lines: nominated at AfD; notified Purono (talk · contribs) 02:46, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP. The BEFORE search turned up nothing relevant to notability.
3. All-Star Miracle Home: nominated at AfD; notified Sandyb1 (talk · contribs) 22:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Total spam. Would G11, but it's somehow survived for several years like this. The fundamental purpose of this page seems to be to promote a lottery, and it would need to be rewritten entirely to do anything else. Notability is also somewhat unclear based on the BEFORE search. I also suspect it to be a copyright violation, but I wasn't able to identify where it came from.

1. Firoz Chaudhary (Singer): nominated at AfD; notified Mr76356 (talk · contribs) 08:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Repeatedly declined AfC submission moved to articlespace by the creator. Non-notable musician, BEFORE search turned up 1 result, which seems to be a self-published source anyway. Fails GNG and NMUSICIAN.
2. Amal Ghandour: nominated at AfD 09:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: A non-notable author, who wrote a non-notable book about a non-notable person and worked at non-notable companies (went to notable universities but that's it). Abysmally fails GNG and the subject specific guidelines too. A BEFORE search only turned up non-independent sources, or a passing mention in a press release by some organisation she was on the board of.

1. Donhee Ham: nominated at AfD; notified Earswideopen (talk · contribs) 16:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Seems to fail WP:NACADEMIC, and WP:GNG. A BEFORE search turned up a few published papers, and some passing mentions (in non-independent sources) as having worked on a single study involving rat neurons and "copy and paste" of neural connections. Everything else was non-independent, databases, or Wikipedia mirrors.
2. GoToTraining: nominated at AfD; notified Treyclarkcol (talk · contribs) 07:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. BEFORE search turned up nothing significant.
3. Lugansk People's Republic (Russia): nominated at AfD; notified PLATEL (talk · contribs) 14:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Same reasons as Zaporozhye Oblast (Russia) and Kherson Oblast (Russia). Unnecessary fork with an inherent likelihood of turning into a POV fork, and makes maintenance difficult. Best to keep it within existing articles.

1. Template:Uw-dttr2: nominated at TfD; notified L293D (talk · contribs) 02:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: There was a discussion earlier which bundled this and dttr3 along with dttr4im. Dttr4im is a humour template, and appears to have confused the discussion somewhat. Based on my reading of that discussion, had dttr4im been excluded from the discussion, it would've ended with dttr2 and 3 being redirected or deleted.
     Dttr2 and dttr3 are not humourous, they are serious, which is a bit odd when the first and last templates in the series are humour templates. Dttr2 is basically a duplicate of {{Uw-tempabuse2}}, serving the same purpose, abusive use of warning templates.
     The "tempabuse" series switches to {{Uw-disruptive3}} for level 3. If an editor is going around abusing templates after two prior warnings, then dttr3 is probably not going to be the best template anyway. Dttr3 is therefore functionally a duplicate of uw-disruptive3
     Whether an editor has a "high edit count" is, quite frankly, irrelevant when deciding if they should be templated. WP:DTTR is by no means widely accepted, and should absolutely NOT be enforced with templates which unironically say that editors with high edit counts should not be templated.
2. Template:2021 National Football League (Ireland) Division 2 South table: nominated at TfD; notified Gaois (talk · contribs) 16:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unused templates, seem to have been abandoned about 6 months ago, could leave it open for REFUND.

1. Srushti Jayant Deshmukh: nominated at AfD; notified Dhirendra Singh bundela (talk · contribs) 13:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Per WP:BLP1E, not notable for anything beyond a single event.

1. Sensor Coating Systems: nominated at AfD; notified Wpboyer (talk · contribs) 07:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Article exists to promote the company. What's more important though is that there are no independent, reliable sources which cover this company, even in passing. Hopelessly non-notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.
2. Christopher McKitterick: nominated at AfD; notified Cmckit (talk · contribs) 03:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NACADEMIC.
3. Center for the Study of Science Fiction: nominated at AfD; notified Cmckit (talk · contribs) 03:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.
4. Patamar Capital: nominated at AfD; notified Matthew Harp (talk · contribs) 06:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Notability tagged for years, fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, is written like a company profile, and seems to be a spam magnet.

1. Analogue Bubblebath IV: nominated at AfD; notified 65.50.87.223 (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Was PRODDED by User:Donaldd23 with the rationale "Appears to fail WP:NALBUM", and redirected to another article by Explicit after the PROD expired. However an IP restored the content, claiming that WP:NALBUM doesn't apply to EPs (it does), and invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF. So now we have to come here.
2. Charles Grigsby: nominated at AfD; notified 141.150.35.44 (talk · contribs) 00:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Was redirected to American Idol (season 2)#Top 12 finalists by User:Bgsu98, then restored by User:Jpcase with the rationale: "Has released multiple albums since he was on Idol. I'm not sure that redirecting this is the correct course." The redirect was restored by User:Onel5969, with the rationale: "Restore redirect - not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG". The article was then restored by User:Aspects with the rationale: "rv redirect that was already contested and per WP:BRD, there should be a WP:MERGE discussion or an WP:AFD."
3. Analogue Bubblebath 5: nominated at AfD; notified Conkern65 (talk · contribs) 01:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Was PRODDED by User:Donaldd23 with the rationale "Appears to fail WP:NALBUM", and redirected to another article by Explicit after the PROD expired. However an IP restored the content, claiming that WP:NALBUM doesn't apply to EPs (it does), and invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF. So now we have to come here. This is separate from the "Analogue Bubblebath IV" AfD, but the same sequence of events has brought it here.

1. List of Acts of the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: nominated at AfD; notified Carolina2k22 (talk · contribs) 09:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP:LISTN, WP:LISTPURP and WP:NOTDB. Primarily consists of hundreds of redlinks to non-notable laws which in all likelihood, never will be notable. It also unnecessarily duplicates a large part of List of statutes of New Zealand (2017–present).

1. Tobati–Enggros languages: nominated at RfD; Target: Tobati language (notified); notified Blackman Jr. (talk · contribs) 22:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Factually incorrect and misleading, no such language group exists. The creating user made several other hoax-like pages.
2. Ankur Kalra: nominated at AfD; notified Andcentra (talk · contribs) 02:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Seems to fail NPROF, ANYBIO and GNG, lacks any reliable independent sources and my BEFORE search didn't find anything which helped this pages case. Furthermore, the subject appears to be sending paid editors at the page to "improve" it, leaving it a mess of promo and fluff.