Wrote a lot of articles about Chuck and other things way back. Dropped off the map in 2013 and came back in 2018 to defend the honor of the UCF Knights.

• ^ a: Was a redirect. I made it an article
  
• ^ b: I created it as a redirect and later made it an article
  
• ^ c: Transferred from userspace draft by Ambaryer
  
• ^ d: I created the redirect and came back to re-write it after someone made it an article
  

Not only is it ironic that the leading authority of wikipedia quality standards is wikipedia itself, but also that the top of the pages hints at the fact that the said article might be unreliable.

— Conrthomas at Talk:Reliability of Wikipedia.

Thank you for reading, ignoring, and removing the notice. Your notice of the notice has been noticed, and then restored.

— SudoGhost in an edit summary for List of highest-grossing films.

I guess you... don't want to be congratulated?

— Quadell, referring to my removal of a "Congratulations" template from my talk page

Today's lesson: if you don't want an editor to blow up at you, don't go onto his talk page and call him a dick.

— 28bytes, closing a civility issue discussion concerning Malleus Fatuorum (see our conflict here and here)

Can I buy some pot from you?

— Darkwarriorblake, reverting vandalism to The Avengers (2012 film)

I WILL add refs.

— Fanaction2031, making light of my earlier impatient edits to The Dark Knight Rises

I just wanted to drop by and give you my infinite apologies for 'changing information' and adding a duplicate reference. If I ever again I am foolish enough to think that I am scholarly enough to add edit an article about an upcoming movie about a billionaire that dresses up like a bat and solves crimes, I will scour the reference list and compare it to my own. As an act of contrition, I've boiled the hand I used to make the edit in hot lead, while reciting 'I shall not inconvenience more prolific editors, or may God have mercy on my soul' rhythmically at the top of my lungs, and banging a drum with my free, non-editing hand for one hour. Thank you for your time; while I am unworthy I pray for your forgiveness.

— Williamsburgland, in an extremely sarcastic response to my edit summary

You are the one who broke the rules, and you are the one who is inefficient, abhorrent, and frankly, a cunt. You have lost this argument a long time ago, and if your only response to this is to bombard constructive editors with bad-faith template warnings and accuse admins of bias or conspiracy, then just go ahead and eat about eight pounds of ball bag and stop editing forever. Please.

— User:Grapple X, to DavisJune in one of the best insults I have ever heard

	Congratulations!
	Thanks for all the work you did in making Dual Spires a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell (talk)

	The Wisdom of Solomon Award
	For displaying a maturity in admitting to mistakes, that some editors chronologically older than you would do well to emulate. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 06:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	for quick and clean compromise involving hatnotes on The Cape article. RadioFan (talk) 00:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your significant contributions that helped promote Captain America: The First Avenger to good article status.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	I like your work, and your profile, and you should keep it up! Americus55 (talk) 00:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your significant contributions that helped promote The Avengers (2012 film) to good article status.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:57, 12 December 2012 (UTC)