User:Balloonman/CSD Survey/2.4
| Quicklinks |
|---|
| Other Excellent articles on CSD |
Original Article
ASSALAM ALIKUM L.A. IQBAL HE WAS A GREAT PLAYER OF HIS TIME .HE STAY IN MALAKPET HYDERABAD .HE IS REALLY A SIMPLE MAN .AND HE HAVE MANY FANS ..
Nomination Criteria
G1 Patent nonsense. Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, poorly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases.
Patent nonsense is defined as:
Patent nonsense. Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, poorly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases.
Deletion Options
| rationale | Count | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Agree with rationale to speedy delete. | 4 | 6.3 |
| Disagree with rationale. G1 explicitly excludes foreign language or poorly written articles, but deletable by other criteria. | 44 | 68.8 |
| Disagree with rationale. G1 explicitly excludes foreign language or poorly written articles, but this is a case where IAR applies. | 0 | 0 |
| Disagree with speedy deletion (should be PRODDED, sent to AFD, or kept.) | 16 | 25 |
Survey Comments
| Common rationale | Count |
|---|---|
| A1 | 5 |
| A7 | 9 |
| G3 | 2 |
| G2 | 1 |
- Would have used A1; can't tell who the article's supposed to be about - google searches show no relevant hits for "L.A. IQBAL" or "ASSALUM ALIKUM"
- A7, people. Learn it, live it, love it.
- should be checked first to see if there are refs; he just might be famous
- Techincally, I wouldn't mind this being deleted by A1 rationale, but cleanup would be the best option if possible.
- Not gibberish, just broken English. A7 nearly qualifies but better safe than sorry.
- Has meaningful content. Prod rather than A7, as article asserts importance.
- A Google search gives me nothing, so I'd delete this under A1.
- would do a web search and either edit or prod depending on what found
Balloonman's analysis
G1 does not apply because at worst it is poorly written. It reads as an article written by a non-English speaker.
G3 does not apply because this is not a deliberate attempt of misinformation/vandalism.
A7 does not apply because it makes a claim to importance/significance.
A1 does apply because while it makes a claim to importance/significance, who knows what that is. He's a great player, but of what? The name doesn't give us enough to identify who this person is or know what it is talking about.