The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move both per request. Because of the switch, I hand dabbed all transclusions originally pointing here to {{Cinderella (band)}}, before the primary move..--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cinderella (Fairy tale) → Template:Cinderella
• Template:Cinderella → Template:Cinderella (band)

– It seems pretty clear to me that most people interested in linking Cinderella related content are interested in the fairy tale and not the band. Note that the articles corresponding to the templates are at Cinderella and Cinderella (band). The templates should be named accordingly.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC) TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - this is non-controversial. Apteva (talk) 04:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong support for renaming the band template. Templates should be disambiguated like their parent articles, or have more disambiguation, and this band is definitely at the wrong name. Weak support for the fairy tale rename. If the fairy tale template isn't renamed then the plain "Template:Cinderella" should be deleted or redirected to the fairy tale template, since no redirect should exist if the fairy tale isn't the target. The band certainly shouldn't be targetted. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 01:59, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.