This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sexology and sexuality This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality

Change "Men who have sex with men" to "Men who have sex with other men" and change "Women who have sex with women" to "Women who have sex with other women" 68.108.68.211 (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Men who have sex with men and Women who have sex with women. Johnuniq (talk) 05:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to add Sex economy at first in tbe sex industry section. 103.67.158.55 (talk) 01:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. That (confusingly titled) article appears to be about the application of economic theory to sex, and not about the economics of the sex industry. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 03:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the current version of the template, a link to Adolescent sexuality in the United States is juxtaposed with links to Sexuality in ancient Rome, ... Sexuality in South Korea. There's a somewhat inappropriate implication there, and I am not aware of another article that could take that link's place; so I request removal of the link. 209.166.108.199 (talk) 18:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC) 209.166.108.199 (talk) 18:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: No such link exists nor did it in the version linked. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality § Help needed with semi-protected template. 209.166.108.199 (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stumbled across Sexually active life expectancy and thought perhaps it could benefit from being added to this template? skarz (talk) 16:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]