The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 09:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

• ... that one Belgian historian believed that Skanderbeg was a sanjakbey of the Sanjak of Nicopolis?

• Reviewed: Shukri al-Quwatli

Created by Antidiskriminator (talk). Self nominated at 12:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC).

• New enough, long enough, well-referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref AGF and cited inline. Since only one historian is quoted in the article with this opinion, I tweaked the hook accordingly. It's a very catchy hook IMO. QPQ done. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)