The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 21:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

• ... that some practices found in Jewish customs of etiquette can be traced back to ancient Rome?

• Reviewed:
• Comment: I will fulfill my QPQ obligation by reviewing the article Yuval Raphael.

Davidbena (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC).

• For the record: In the past month, I have completed three QPQs. These are: 1) David Einhorn (poet), 2) Deval Mosque, and 3) Yuval Raphael.Davidbena (talk) 17:34, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
• Article is new enough and long enough. Citations to reliable sources throughout. Offline source, foreign language references, and sources behind paywalls accepted in good faith; including verification of the hook fact which has an inline citation in the article to the Morell source. No copyright violation detected, and the hook fact is interesting. My only concern is the large amount of bulleted lists used in the article. @Davidbena per MOS:LISTBULLET and MOS:EMBED bulleted lists should be avoided whenever possible in favor of prose paragraphs. I'm not sure that all of these bullets are truly necessary, and its very possible that the article could be tagged for style issues if it ran on the main page in its current state. The last thing we want is to have the article get tagged and then pulled from the main page because it was tagged. I urge you to take a critical eye to reducing the number of bulleted lists wherever possible per the MOS recommendations. To be clear, I'm not saying you can't use some embedded lists in the article but not in the current excessive amount. Best.4meter4 (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

@4meter4: I'll follow your directives and will try and reduce the bullets in favor of prose paragraphs, and I will also try and work on its overall style.Davidbena (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

@4meter4: This is for your information: I went through the article again and deleted portions that were less important or superfluous. I also improved on the general style, and deleted the vast majority of the bullets by reconstructing the sentences and putting them into prose paragraphs. I only left a few bullets in two sections: 1) "Use of honorifics" and 2) "Valedictions." It already looks better. If you feel that there is something else that needs removing, because it may be redundant or unnecessary, please feel free to do so.Davidbena (talk) 01:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Looks great. Good work! My concerns have been addressed. This hook can be promoted.4meter4 (talk) 01:27, 5 February 2025 (UTC)