This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Africa Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article was created or improved during the "African 10,000 Challenge", which started in 1 September 2016 and is still continuing. You can help! Zambia Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zambia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Zambia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZambiaWikipedia:WikiProject ZambiaTemplate:WikiProject ZambiaZambia Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Countries This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry WikiProject Countries to-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy. Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region. Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

RCB88, you are correct that all the material you removed is uncited. Materialscientist, was your initial revert because you believe this content is likely to be verifiable information? If so, I agree. RCB88, would you be willing to look for sources to verify some of the content you've removed? That would be the best way to improve the article. Otherwise, would you be willing to just mark it with "citation needed" tags so that someone else can find the sources? Thanks for drawing attention to this problem with unsourced information in the article! Larataguera (talk) 12:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no mention of this incredible Zambian? 97.116.44.245 (talk) 14:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]