This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article was accepted from this draft on 27 December 2018 by reviewer Snowycats (talk· contribs).
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
@Ted52: Thanks for your work on this article. However, there are some issues with a few of the sources, which would not count as reliable for Wikipedia purposes because they are self-published, such as www.ritterkreuztraeger.info and Lexikon der Wehrmacht. There doesn't seem to be a consensus as to whether HistoryNet is reliable. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 10:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
When I originally submitted the article, I did so under the name *XIX Army Corps (Germany)*. It was upon approval moved to just *XIX Army Corps*, breaking the style of other Wikipedia article. I would suggest moving it to *XIX Army Corps (Wehrmacht)* and reinstate *XIX Army Corps* as a disambiguation page.