This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography High‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. England High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Yorkshire Top‑importance West Yorkshire is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Bradford Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bradford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bradford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BradfordWikipedia:WikiProject BradfordTemplate:WikiProject BradfordBradford Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Geography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs

original white paper had Knaresborough and Harrogate being part of the West Yorkshire county, in the same district as Leeds.

Rothwell was proposed to move from Leeds -> Wakefield

a government amendment kept Kearby with Netherby, Sicklinghall and Weeton in North Yorkshire rather than in Leeds district

194.66.226.95 18:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, the capital (i.e. the location of the government of the county) was always Wakefield, not Leeds. Leeds was only ever the largest city and commercial heart. 77.97.137.23 20:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, thats true, County Hall is on Wood Street in Wakefield. -- Chris as I am Chris 10:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wakefield is not the capital of West Yorkshire. It was the county town of the West Riding of Yorkshire (which hasn't existed since 1974). As far as I am aware, West Yorkshire has no official county town.Mtaylor848 (talk) 12:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am calling upon all users with knowledge on the West Yorkshire Derby(s) so that the article can be expanded. Any help or co-operation would be much appreciated. Regards IJA (talk) 14:50, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the addition of a "Flag of West Yorkshire" (File:Flag of West Yorkshire.svg), as the file description page makes it clear that it's the former flag of the county council, abolished 1986, rather than of the county as a whole - and it's totally unsourced, obscure, unfamiliar to long-standing local resident, etc. It doesn't improve this article. PamD 15:52, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Petty, unnecessary editing. Every other county has a flag or arms of some type, why not just leave it if it offers some heraldic representation. It was never revoked after all. - H (talk) 19:08, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from your comment being 16 months late,;and that Pam was right in removing the flag, which was the county 'Council 'insignia, not the county flag and therefore neither petty nor unnecessary editing. You are correct in pointing out that that ther current Official County flag should be on the article. That will shortly be corrected. Richard Harvey (talk) 11:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:West Yorkshire/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 12:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on West Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20020606075048/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/metropolitan.asp to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/metropolitan.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/food/industry/regional/foodname/products/documents/indoor-yorks-rhubarb-pdo.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The area covers pretty much the already existing West Yorkshire county with a few villages and towns missing. All fall within Kirklees, Calderdale, City of Bradford, City of Leeds and City of Wakefield. No notable settlements outside West Yorkshire and should be merged into a tab on the wider article. Plus it only uses ONS Data and census. Maybe more can be found to give it stronger notability it exists and isn't just an ons term? RailwayJG (talk) 01:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Disagree with merger - The Urban area and the county are two distinct things. The built-up area/urban area pre-dates the county and is the reason it was created in the first place. I think having both articles is ok. Eopsid (talk) 21:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose merger: the BUA seems to be a reliably sourced and complicatedly defined entity, distinct from the county although a subset of it, and all this information would be unwieldy as a section within the county article. No reason to merge. PamD 22:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose They are 2 different areas so should be separate articles. It is much easier for people to read an article on the term they are interested in rather than have to disentangle it from part of another article. Keith D (talk) 23:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is pretty much West Yorkshire. It seems silly to have one for this when the county contains three cities. And they are all different from a wider city region. For example West Midlands County can pass as it covers Birmingham a long established city and Coventry. Wolverhampton is a newish city but would have been a town when the county was formed. Another is Greater Manchester. There's two cities Manchester and Salford. The rest are towns and suburbs. The Urban Area at least covers areas like Wilmslow Glossop and Hadfield which are in Cheshire and Derbyshire. These are notable as they are in other counties. But West Yorkshire Urban Area is all the same as the county. Greater Manchester crosses former county boundaries with Cheshire (Stockport, Altrincham, Hyde etc), Lancashire (Oldham, Rochdale, Sale etc) and part of West Riding of Yorkshire (Littlebrough could be wrong) but this gives it good enough stead for an urban area as Manchester is a major city and has a long established built up area. West Midlands County crosses historical boundaries of Staffordshire (Wolverhampton, Walsall, West Bromwich etc), Warwickshire (Sutton Coldfield, Solihull, Coventry, Birmingham etc) and Worcestershire (Dudley, Stourbridge, Halesowen etc) so the county crosses three historic counties. That put it in stead for an urban area as Birmingham is the second city and area includes parts of Lichfield District, South Staffordshire, Cannock Chase, North Warwickshire and Worcestershire. These would work for an urban area for both modern and historic reasons. But West Yorkshire Urban area is pretty much part of former West Riding of Yorkshire. If there was a significant town like Harrogate or Selby in the urban area then I could see it with a stronger stance but this is already repeating what is in the West Yorkshire Article. Place names population history etc... RailwayJG (talk) 09:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I contend that the metropolitan counties no longer exist and should therefore be written about in the past tense. This is supported by the fact that this page's web-link isn't to the (non-existent) WYMC but to the WY combined authority which is more a quango than a council. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.149.241.58 (talk) 15:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course they exist. Even though the boroughs are effectively unitary since all governance powers were given to the district councils, WY still exists as an entity for police/fire/lieutenancy etc, and it certainly isn't a non-metropolitan county. The county council was abolished but WYCA takes on a kind of equivalent position these days. I also find combined authority to be a more precise term than quango. Rcsprinter123 (spout) 01:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than 5 cityscapes, I suggest that the information image should show the diversity of the county. The recent version was better, though perhaps an image like the lead of Stoodley Pike should be included to show wide open spaces. PamD 05:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that the choice of first image is important as the reader on a mobile sees this as the header image of the article, so the county is represented by Bradford. PamD 05:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD, these images are kinda referenced at a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Ceremonial county infobox images if you were unaware. But 5 cityscapes do lack diversity. Regards DankJae 21:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DankJae Thanks, yes, I'll be there when not on phone! PamD 22:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Leedsshire has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 6 § Leedsshire until a consensus is reached. Blethering Scot 15:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]