Talk:Waltz in A minor (Chopin)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move 14 December 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 18:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Waltz in A minor (Chopin) → Waltz in A minor, B. 150 (Chopin) – To distinguish it from Waltz in A minor (Chopin, rediscovered 2024). The present sources also identify it as B. 150. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:07, 14 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. cyberdog958Talk 14:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose this A minor Waltz is rather famous and standard repertoire for beginning pianists, in my mind it is a clear primary topic. Its dominance is such, that a simple google search of "Waltz in A minor" (without mentioning Chopin) brings up only this waltz. The rediscovered one is a fragmented sketch, which I doubt will retain much relevance after its discovery. As for the sources: IMSLP always includes cataloguing numbers, even for Renaissance works, in which such catalogues are essentially unknown outside academia; AllMusic is AllMusic... and it looks like the Chopin National Edition just uses "Waltz in A minor".
- Aza24 (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Aza. Additionally, the Brown catalogue is by no means the "standard" way to refer to Chopin's posthumous compositions; a Google search reveals that WN/KK numbers are used just as often. intforce (talk) 15:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.