This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Stations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force. United States: South Carolina This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina.

first, thanks to Montydavis and 69.1.41.205 for contributing this article. i've done a total rewrite to bring the piece more in line with wikipedia's practices and standards, notably:

• formatting. indentation on wikipedia results in ugly pink boxes. i know this doesn't "make sense" as far as the general theories of markup go, but that's the way it is.
• first person. as an ecncycolpedia we avoid use of first person
• no marketing speak. some of the sentences added to this article sounded like they were written originally by the station's marketing department. specifically, stuff like "As the Charleston area continues to grow, you can be assured that WJRB plans to be there every step of the way". as a sentence that contains no facts, and reads like ad copy, it has limited use on wikipedia.

so, after my edits, the article is a lot shorter but, i think, better. frymaster 14:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]