This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
@Another Believer: I've seen some of these sources before and looked through all of them. I don't think they help in establishing the notability of the subject of this article (i.e. the 1993 sculpture located at MIT) because:
These describes a piece of work with the same name and is located elsewhere (Meijer gardens):
This describes another piece of work with the same name, and even though the conceptualization of the pieces may be similar, it makes no reference to the subject of the article:
If there are no other sources that can establish the notability of the subject, then as per WP:WHYN and WP:GNG the subject should be merged into a list or article describing the subject. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 08:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AquaDTRS, Right, can't these sources be used to expand the scope of the article beyond just the 1993 version on the MIT campus? "Two Indeterminate Lines is a series of artworks by Bernar Venet..." ? ---Another Believer(Talk)14:11, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Another Believer: Sure, but what is the claim to significance/notability? Even if there exist sources describing the subject out there, the article itself need to exert a claim stating why it should have its own article (i.e. WP:SIGNIFICANCE). At the moment, this article and the rest I've merged are simply claiming WP:INHERENT notability by merely existing on the MIT campus. The article should also be concerned with the current sources available to describe its subject rather than the possibility of future sources appearing to claim notability (see WP:PAGEDECIDE). -- AquaDTRS (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung