A couple of editors persist in trying to purport that the name "Tuesday Night Massacre" lacks notability despite the fact that it is being used by virtually every news source and is all over social media:

• "Trump's Tuesday night massacre". SF Chronicle. May 9, 2017.
• Bunch, Will (May 9, 2017). "Trump's Tuesday Night Massacre puts U.S. on 'banana republic' brink". Philadelphia Inquirer.
• Kawa, Luke (May 9, 2017). "Five Things You Need to Know to Start Your Day". Bloomberg News.
• Ellefson, Lindsey (May 9, 2017). "Nixon's 'Saturday Night Massacre' and #TuesdayNightMassacre Blow Up on Twitter After Comey Firing". Mediate.
• Roy, Jessica (May 9, 2017). "For the second time since Trump took office, people are talking about Nixon's 'Saturday Night Massacre'". LA Times.
• [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]

I understand that there are lots of mixed feelings about this name and about the topic in general. But regardless of personal feelings, this is the name that is being widely used. There is no justification for hiding it.

--MC

For the record, I'm posting this link:

• Tuesday Night Massacre

BullRangifer (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]