This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Africa: Somalia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Somalia. Somalia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somalia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somalia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomaliaWikipedia:WikiProject SomaliaTemplate:WikiProject SomaliaWikiProject Somalia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It should be noted that the reduced cabinet and the change of ministers was mostly due to the loss of power by the warlords of Mogadisho who lost all their 'lands' and consequently, all their power in the process.

I read an Article in the BBC about it.

Feel free to dig up the article and make a citation and an update to this entry. --Petercorless 18:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article links to "Transitional National Government", but that is a redirect back to this article. It should be explained here. -- Beland 18:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The TFG and the TFP both deserve their own pages. I also wish to have a page for the TFC -- the Charter -- and a page for the concept of the "TFIs" -- the Transitional Federal Institutions, which comprise the TFP, TFC and TFG all combined. The TFG is the executive branch of government, and the TFP is the legislative branch. The charter is, well, the charter. This article conflates the two (TFG+TFP) into a single page. It would be like having the US President and Executive Branch on the same page as Congress. Given some additional contributions by folks, it might be time to try to split these into individual pages. The TFG, which controls the Prime Minister, and all cabinet members including the Ministry of Defense, and thus the army, is where most pages related to the war should link, though there are times when individual members of the TFP -- Members of Parliament -- took their own initiatives and actions which might have supported, or actually run entirely counter, to the TFG (executive branch) directions. Those would link instead to the TFP page. This split is something I have put off for now, but it's on my conceptual "to-do" list. --Petercorless 07:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doah! Also, your point above about the "Transitional National Government" deserves some mention. The TNG is actually the precursor attempt to organize a government before the present "Transitional Federal Government". More acronym soup in the bowl of politics known as Somalia! Again, something on the to-do list, or, we might make a separate TNG page that points to the TFP/TFG as successor organizations. --Petercorless 08:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Closed - Transitional National Government is now separate. --Petercorless 13:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Insert non-formatted text here

I made a split of the History section to a new page: History of the Transitional Federal Government of the Republic of Somalia. This was to allow the main TFP page (and/or a separate TFG page) to remain current—and briefer—while the history page of the nascent government can be a (growing) archival reference. The present TFG page was woefully inadequate of explaining how, precisely, the government got to be established. This was to fill in the gaps for those unfamiliar with the twists and turns of Somali politics. --Petercorless 08:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the color to a normal white background. This page strikes me as a CIA hit list. My first impression of this page is, "Oh here is a list of the people in the region that should be assassinated." It just didn't feel neutral. I'm not sure why but thought I would add this comment here in case anyone else had the same thought. Jeff Carr 15:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The CIA keeps a list of all the members of government of all the nations of the world. This is not a "hit list." --Petercorless 14:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article in mentioning that Somalia has been under the warlords since 1991 fails to mention the functioning government of the Republic of Somaliland in the north. Though Somaliland is not a 'central government' in the sense of claiming to rule over all of Somalia, it is in fact a government and ought to be mentioned in some way, particularly in light of the transitional government's attitudes toward it. --Sephiroth9611 16:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why, yes it does fail to mention Somaliland other than as a "See also" in the Politics of Somalia template. It also fails to mention the government of Puntland and the government of Galmudug, and the government of the ICU. Those each have their own separate pages. They are mentioned on the page regarding the Transitional Federal Charter, which shows that the government claims the territory of Somaliland as part of its sovereign territory. It is also described on the page for the War in Somalia (2006–present), where the protests occurred. What in particular more did you want said here? --Petercorless 14:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With lines like The country has been run for more than a decade by tribal factions and warlords, I just think that this article perpetuates along with the international media the fiction that all of Somalia is in fact a war zone when that is not in fact the case. It comes off as slightly biased in that the TFG is the only force working to stabilize Somalia. --Sephiroth9611 19:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you are commenting on the right Talk page? This is for the Transitional Federal Government (TFG). --Petercorless 14:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know for sure that there were 10 cabinet positions changed recently, but only have citations in the media for about half of them. If anyone can keep an eye out for additional listings, that would be useful. The official TFG page is a mess. --Petercorless 14:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article appears to contradict itself. The lead says that the parliament has "450 members". But the first section (Overview), says that the parliament "had 275 members", which was doubled in 2009, to include "200 representatives from the Islamist opposition and 75 reprentatives of citizens' groups and diaspora representatives". This adds up to 550 members instead of 450. I can't find the correct number anywhere. 83.80.18.68 (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Asha Ahmed Abdalla2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]