This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Agriculture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article seems to concern itself mainly with air-cured barns. Flue-cured barns are altogether different, being mostly log or cinder block construction, and are a prominent part of the landscape in the Old Belt. Should we break the article down into sections by barn type? -Ben (talk) 19:39, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, flue-cured barns break down into pack barns and curing barns. I'll see what I can find on the subject. -Ben (talk) 19:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is some excellent information (including diagrams) on the history of both air- and flue-cured tobacco barns in Kelebrew and Myrick's 1897 book _Tobacco Leaf_. This has been digitized by Google books, and I wonder whether we could use illustrations and diagrams from that? A good example is here: Diagram of Flues. Ben (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a picture showing the hinge on the outside of a tobacco barn, to support the discussion in the article. Because of space issues, it is best to remove one of the images existing, and I felt that with two images of the interior, one could be removed without any problem. Let me know if you think there's a way to accommodate all the images. (I also posted this at the editor who added the original image)--SPhilbrickT 00:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]