This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Christianity: Catholicism / Anglicanism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance). Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Curious: Why use {{sfn}} at all if not to cite specific pages? Without page numbers, why separate the full citations in Citations from those in Sources? You could convert all Sources to Citations without needing short footnotes. Alternatively, all short footnotes can add the specific pages to aid in verification, which is a boon to the reader. But in that case, the remaining full refs in Citations could move to the Sources section. czar 14:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2001. xvi + 232 pp. $22.50 cloth and [untitled] need not be part of the review titles. A common convention is to name reviews Rev. of The Voices of Morebath given that they're often listings in review sections. (I.e., they're just as much that as "[untitled]".) czar 14:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• ... that a 2002 book relies extensively on a 16th-century priest's churchwardens' accounts that include his support for a failed rebellion?

• Reviewed: 1.) Template:Did you know nominations/Hodierna of Jerusalem, 2.) Template:Did you know nominations/Tesseropora rosea, 3.) Template:Did you know nominations/Fatima Payman

Pbritti (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]