This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Marching band Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marching band, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marching bands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marching bandWikipedia:WikiProject Marching bandTemplate:WikiProject Marching bandMarching band Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Pritzker Military Library Start‑class Low‑importance This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. United States: Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Mid-importance). Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

I went through Air Force ROTC in the 1970s, and distinctly remember that these were the official lyrics in effect at the time. I also distinctly remember how embarrassed I was to sing them during AFROTC Field Training (summer camp).

PhantomWSO (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This section has no bearing to the article itself, other than both are (now) about the Air Force. I propose a split into separate articles.--Reedmalloy (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even though this is an old proposal Oppose for the record. There was a definite attitude during the 1950s and 1960s that all this "down in flames" stuff was unprofessional, and U.S. Air Force Blue was at least semi-officially the Air Force song for a while. No idea how to find a reliable source for this, but we used to joke about it when I was in ROTC. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's right that the lyrics should be updated with recent changes, but the older lyrics ought to also be preserved in an appropriate section explaining the change. --68.48.249.140 (talk) 11:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The last two versions of the article that I have seen are both deficient. The lyrics section had shown only the new lyrics, which erased the long history of the original version of the song. And now the current edit is a revert, which fails to show that any change has been made.

The proper way to present the lyrics is to show both versions, pre- and post-change. This is an encyclopedia. And it needs to communicate both the current status as well as the history. And the change info should not be buried in the text of the article which imposes upon the reader to reconstruct either version.

I am sure that there are examples of similar changes handled across Wikipedia which can be used to serve as a guide for this article. -- Tdadamemd19 (talk) 14:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there is the side by side in the third verse section. Garuda28 (talk) 19:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only the 3rd verse was changed. All other verses remain steeped in sexism.

Then there is the reason why the 3rd verse was changed. This has been attributed to Brie Larson. The spike in female applicants to the Air Force Academy has been referred to as the "Captain Marvel Effect". There have been women in the Air Force since the beginning. There have been female pilots in the USAF since the 1970s. And there have been AF women flying fighters since 1993. This switch to non-sexist lyrics for the 3rd verse happened exactly one year after the release of Brie Larson's movie.

Even after the changes announced one week ago, the song as a whole is still quite sexist, with the most egregious line being "At 'em boys, give her the gun." You'd think with all the attention that rape and sexual harassment has gotten, that line would have been the FIRST thing they would have changed in the song. Here is the Air Force Times article which discusses these other issues:
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/02/27/air-force-has-updated-its-song-be-gender-neutral.html

So it can be guessed that the current form of the lyrics are in the middle of a transition toward a song which is fully gender neutral. That article explains that the Chief of Staff "Goldfein said it is an important discussion that is ongoing". Kind of like how the Air Force went through a period of DADT before completing that policy change. -- Tdadamemd19 (talk) 14:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reflects the policy of using female airmen in combat roles. ‘Sexism’ is a loaded, POV term, and does not belong in the article. Or criticism of the policy, that should go in an article discussing that. 2A00:23C7:E287:1900:2DD6:E0E4:1223:B420 (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In 1989 the Airmans Technical Order issued by Air Training Command printed this song with "terrible roar" in its lyrics. All of us were instructed to make a pen & ink change to change it to "hell of a roar" and we were told to sing it that way. Was there a period where the song was officially printed with the mild lyrics out of political correctness? -Rolypolyman (talk) 18:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be some confusion over whether or not the song is in the public domain. The citation in this article to https://web.archive.org/web/20100822010136/http://www.usafband.af.mil/education/arrangements/airforceblue/index.asp says "yes", but over at https://www.music.af.mil/Multimedia/AF-Recordings/Air-Force-Song/ the Air Force says "no" and that one should go to https://www.carlfischer.com/ to get a license. What's going on here? -- Frotz(talk) 06:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not found anything that backs the assertion in that section. Has anyone else found anything?Afheather (talk) 04:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]