Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:The Magnetic Fields

Fair use rationale for Image:The magnetic fields holiday album cover.jpg

Image:The magnetic fields holiday album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use - Discography

The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. -- Merope 18:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Longoria edit

Sorry everyone, I can't figure out how to do a citation. But the reference for Eva Longoria and Tony Parker's wedding dance to "Book of Love" is from People (http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20045213,00.html)

twee

The word twee doesn't appear anywhere on this page. Can that be right? -- Zarvok | Talk 03:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Magnetic Fields' music doesn't really fit into that category, does it? (The only connection I can see is that twee is associated with homosexuality and Stephin Merritt publishes his music under the name "Gay and Loud.") Llajwa 16:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He's clearly being a smartarse. Tell him to shove it up his arse. Magnetic Fields rock!!60.240.153.58 (talk) 17:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"unorthodox" instruments

The instruments named as "unorthodox instruments" are orthodox instruments. They were created for the purpose of making music. For instance, one might consider a hammer an unorthodox instrument, but by no means is a cello "unorthodox." I would not even consider many of these instruments unorthodox within the synthpop genre, which is known for using a variety of instruments as well as truly unorthodox instruments. This sentence needs to be clarified as to what the author meant by using the word "unorthodox."

Question from article

"comment: Magnetophone isn't a Galaxie 500 spin-off, aside from being founded seven years later in 1998. Did the author mean Damon & Naomi?" --AW (talk) 04:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Characterization of music as 1980s synth pop in opening paragraph

Is this at all accurate? This is more accurate of SOME albums under the MF moniker, but applies mostly to albums Merritt has released under the name Future Bible Heroes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.78.12 (talk) 04:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Just by the numbers, I'd say it's incorrect to label them synthpop. At least half of their catalog isn't. It's also misleading to say Merritt's music is in an 80s synthpop style because the influence of Brian Wilson, Phil Spector, and other vintage rock and pop figures is quite apparent. You can't call it synthpop just because synthesizers are prominent. Other than indie pop and indie rock, vague descriptors, I can't think of any other fitting classification of the band. Jonas.E.B. 06:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I did an interview with Claudia Gonson of this group, so I feel it deserves to be a part of this page. Then WHY, when other band interviews are included on this page in the link AREA, why cannot MINE? Kingtommy2020 (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get links to your own site into Wikipedia is a conflict of interest, and discouraged. If it's important, someone else will add it. --McGeddon (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Rome?

Does anyone have any more information about the Buffalo Rome project? More importantly, I know the LD Beghtol book mentions Buffalo Rome, but does it mention he played all the instruments? I don't recall that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotbrodu (talk) 03:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
At the lack of any interest whatsoever, I have removed that information. Please contact me before adding it again without verifiable sources. Dotbrodu (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Indie pop is accurate as an overarching genre for their whole body of work and synth pop constitutes a large portion of their discography (most everything pre-69 love songs). Noise pop, on the other hand, is only really present on one album (Distortion) and I'm not exactly sure where indie folk fits in, at all. I'm going to make the appropriate edits in the infobox. Mbza (talk) 09:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

-- well, Stephin likes to insist that they are a calypso band, indie folk is a better way of phrasing that. their musical style isn't really folk, but there is a good amount of folk influence. i thought that any genre that they've released music under could be listed in the infobox, but that's fine. 75.48.78.183 (talk) 01:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing, rather than encyclopedic

Much of the article reads as a marketing / promotional piece, using extravagent, subjective adjectives to 'pump up' the band and its members and albums. It should read as a factual, encyclopedic article if it is to be on Wikipedia.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Magnetic Fields. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

An actual band history?

The history section jumps from 1991 to 1999, jumping over the first 5 releases and pretending that that 6th, 7th, and 8th release were initially released as one. It needs serious fleshing out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810D:980:29C8:FC5C:ED97:39C2:293E (talk) 00:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Magnetic_Fields