This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books: Reference works This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook This article is supported by the Reference works task force. English Language This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Hi, I just (in addition to changing a relatively obvious error of "lead" for "led" as the past tense of lead) added a whole bunch of clean-up templates on this tiny article, which looks like the topic could be interesting or notable, but contains almost no information, and some surprising claims without further elaboration or explanation (for example, the article states that the publication of this dictionary "most likely led to [Coote] losing his job as headmaster," but I don't get why that would be so, especially if it's not even certain, but only most likely, so this seems dubious and potentially Original research. If someone could find a reference and a logical explanation, I would tremendously appreciate it. Some other problems I had can be found in the version history for my edits here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_English_Schoole-Master&oldid=1016181177, the accompanying edit summary, and even the main body text. If anyone has other issues I did not cover you can bring them up too; I'm just hoping someone can fix them and clean this article up, probably involving extensive expansion from its current very-much-a-stub form. Thank you for helping, fellow wikipedians! 2600:6C44:237F:ACCB:B4EA:3949:B4DA:BB55 (talk) 20:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]