This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women in Red This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Brazil Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thamirys Nunes in 2023

• ... that after discovering her child was transgender, Thamirys Nunes (pictured) created Minha Criança Trans, an organization dedicated to defending transgender youth?

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Last Song for You and Template:Did you know nominations/United Palace.

Skyshiftertalk 14:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

• I’ve never done this before, like ever, so sorry if I’m doing this wrong, but I don’t see anything wrong here and didn’t like that someone was being needlessly combative about it based on, apparently, their own personal interpretation of the subject matter and not whether the hook was any good. Dronebogus (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Dronebogus: thank you! Skyshiftertalk 14:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Dronebogus: since that was your first review: for the DYK review, you need to check if all WP:DYKCRIT are met. If you have checked all criteria and the articles meet them, then it is good to go. Skyshiftertalk 15:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• As Skyshifter notes, Dronebogus has not provided a full review; one is needed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • New enough and long enough. Double QPQ present. Hook fact checks out. Image is libre licensed. No textual issues I see. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]