This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Article is new and long enough. Hook is interesting, present and cited in the article, and the rest of the article's sourcing looks good to me as well. Earwig raises no concerns. QPQ has been taken care of. My only (minor) concern is regarding the wording of the hook. The source seems ambiguous as to what New Zealanders drank more tea than people in Britain did exactly means; is it definitely "per capita" or is it just "the total amount of tea consumed by New Zealanders was greater than the total amount of tea consumed by Britons"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PCN02WPS (talk • contribs)
@PCN02WPS: Thanks for the review. I interpret the source as 'per capita' because after the sentence about New Zealanders drinking more tea, it says "consumption declined over time – from 3–3.5 kilograms per person annually". And I reckon that it is unlikely that NZ would consume more tea in total than the UK because in the early 1900s NZ had a population of about 1 million whereas the UK had a population of about 40 million people. ―Panamitsu(talk)23:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]