This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

British Museum High‑importance This article relates to the British Museum. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one, as needed.British MuseumWikipedia:GLAM/British MuseumTemplate:WikiProject British MuseumBritish Museum-related High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts China This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

"The Chinese Tang Tomb Figures are thirteen ceramic figures found in the tomb of Liu Tingxun..." The actual subject of the article that the title offers is Chinese Tang tomb figures. These thirteen from one tomb, now in the BM, are simply examples of Tang Dynasty tomb figures. As it stands, this article's correct title is something along the line of Tang Dynasty tomb figures of Liu Tingxun.--Wetman (talk) 04:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Wetman, there is a debate on my talk page about this with people arguing both ways. I'm quite happy for you to make this change as I can see your point (although there are counter arguments). I'd prefer if this didnt disturb the stats but do feel free to act if you think its urgent. At the moment I don't think the hook is misrepresenting what people will expect to find as it mentions the 13 figures. Victuallers (talk) 10:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that is probably the best title; it's fortunate there is a probable "owner's" name here - usually there isn't. It can be moved now it's off the main page, maybe in a day or two. Johnbod (talk) 11:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]