This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance). Video games High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Somebody put a note in the Model III section that the high-resolution graphics screen resolution of 640 x 240 listed in the Radio Shack catalog is a misprint and that it should be 512 x 192. There is no reference or basis for this, and it is not correct. There were third party graphics solutions for the Model III that are 512 x 192, but the official Radio Shack solution is 640 x 240. I know this because I owned and programmed one. I have made corrections with added references. --Willus (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this whole article be writen in the past tense? New models aren't being made, the present tense shouldn't normally used, no? 71.11.5.2 (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]