Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Suze (The Cough Song)

Good articleSuze (The Cough Song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 30, 2023Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 11, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that when recording what became "Suze (The Cough Song)", Bob Dylan started coughing, then said that the song ended before his coughing started, and asked the producer to fade it out?

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk10:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that when recording what became “Suze (The Cough Song)”, Bob Dylan started coughing, then said that the song ended before his coughing started, and asked the producer to fade it out? Source: Margotin, Philippe; Guesdon, Jean-Michel (2022). Bob Dylan All the Songs: The Story Behind Every Track p.108: "Dylan had a sudden coughing fit at 1:30 which led him to ask Tom wilson, his producer, to end the song with fafe-out".

Created by BennyOnTheLoose (talk). Self-nominated at 21:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Suze (The Cough Song); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Suze (The Cough Song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 20:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This should be done quickly! --K. Peake 20:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Infobox and lead

  • How long ago dates were does not need to be noted in the infobox
  • The exacty recording date and studio are not sourced anywhere in the body
  • WP:OVERLINK of Columbia under label(s)
  • "during the sessions for" → "during the sessions for his third studio album,"
  • "The track was written" → "The song was written"
  • "by Dylan and produced by" → "by Dylan, and produced by"
  • "started ninety seconds" → "started 90 seconds" per MOS:NUM
  • Move the standalone sentence to being in the same para as the rest since this is not enough on its own
  • "found the track enjoyable." → "found the song enjoyable."

Background and recording

  • Add a comma after E tuning
  • "ninety seconds into" → "90 seconds into" per MOS:NUM
  • "before saying that the song" → "until saying that the song" to avoid using before twice in one sentence
  • "and the stanza's return." is this definitely about one stanza because if multiple, remove the apostrophe
  • Pipe Jimmie Tarlton to Darby and Tarlton
  • Add double speech marks around "Percy's Song"

Release and reception

  • The tense of reviews needs to be consistent

Personnel

  • Good

References

Final comments and verdict