Steganography was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 29, 2005 Peer review Reviewed June 11, 2006 Good article nominee Not listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cryptography: Computer science High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as High-importance).

"Auctor Sapientissimus Conseruans Angelica Deferat Nobis Charitas Potentissimi Creatoris" as "VICIPEDIA." True, and good joke. At first I thought the assertion was that Trithemius himself used this example. Took me a second, but then I laughed. Bloodychiclitz (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]