This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
I feel there should be more content on plot of the film. Just one sentence looks insufficient. If it was based on a popular play, and was remade 50 years later, there should be more plot line available.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A story based on the series of plays was made fifty years later, certainly not a scene-for-scene remake. What was in the play(s) and what was ultimately in this film are not necessarily the same, and giving the plot summary for a play or later film (and not this one) would be intellectually dishonest. As is, none of the references I've had access to discuss this film's plot. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:24, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming that available sources were all searched (majority in Indonesian), and no more information is available (plot or any other aspect of the film), I think there are no other issues with this article. It is written well, has appropriate references, has appropriately licensed images, and follows MoS. Only issue was coverage, and, as Crisco has explained, there is no more data. So, I have no problem in promoting this to GA. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:19, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung