This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips Transport: Maritime Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Themailguy. Peer reviewers: Rickyediting, Duke.met.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I edited out some absurd looking quotes around the words 'defense enterprise' regarding Northrop-Grumman. Cynical Scare Quotes are hardly an NPOV thing. Doesn't matter whether the topic is related. - Kade 06:33, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This article needs heavy revision. It seems to be heavily dependent on people with special interests supplying information about the country or yard with which they are most familiar. As a result, the section listing "Prominent Dockyards and Shipyards" is so far out of proportion as to be positively misleading. (For example, you would get the idea that the US is a prominent shipbuilding country and China is not.) The article on "Shipbuilding" is much more balanced. In the present article, the list section should be deleted with a link referring to the separate article "List of shipbuilders and shipyards". Mstarli (talk) 07:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The South East Asia section completely ignores several important yards in Singapore which is a major shipbuilding nation as well.

182.19.157.251 (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shipyard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090416044543/http://www.destroyers.org/How%20Destroyers%20Built/dd-bldg-images/bscsi-main.htm to http://www.destroyers.org/How%20Destroyers%20Built/dd-bldg-images/bscsi-main.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100625031924/http://www.worldencompassed.com/warsicilianvespers/Fleet/drassanes.html to http://www.worldencompassed.com/warsicilianvespers/Fleet/drassanes.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040511102641/http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/nof/docks/ to http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/nof/docks
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111012090706/http://www.slkb-shipyard.com/history to http://www.slkb-shipyard.com/history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]