This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Connecticut Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Maps Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove |autoi=yes.

Could this sound more like an Ad?

This should be cleaned up to sound like an actual objective report. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.60.176.223 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 23 July 2010‎ (UTC) 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These were being used improperly. Maybe they will prove useful as sources:

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]

Other sources that may prove useful:

• [5]
• [6]
• [7]
• [8]

MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 04:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added the most concrete information from these articles. A rewrite is still called for, though. MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 02:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]