Seagram Building is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 26, 2022.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 4, 2021 Good article nominee Listed January 16, 2022 Featured article candidate Not promoted March 22, 2022 Featured article candidate Promoted A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 18, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a head was displayed in the Seagram Building's plaza in 1968? Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Skyscrapers High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on October 21, 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Seagram Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110719135730/http://cala.arizona.edu/courses/arc103/trad103/tutorials/architecture_history/problem_sets/20th_century/high_tech/04t.html to http://cala.arizona.edu/courses/arc103/trad103/tutorials/architecture_history/problem_sets/20th_century/high_tech/04t.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the relatively famous restaurant that resided in the building from 1959-2016 be mentioned in the article? After all it's interior design was also done by van der Rohe and Johnson, so it too works with the exterior and interior concept already mentioned in the article. The Article on The Four Seasons Restaurant already links back to the Seagram Building, so it's weird that it isn't included here. --5.146.47.110 (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 12:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seagram Building

• ... that Ludwig Mies van der Rohe was given an unlimited budget to design New York City's Seagram Building (pictured)? Source: Bagli, Charles V. (October 12, 2000). "On Park Avenue, Another Trophy Changes Hands". The New York Times.
  • ALT1:... that the Seagram Building (pictured) was redesigned after Phyllis Lambert, daughter of the CEO of the company developing the building, had been "boiling with fury" at the original plan? Source: Stern, Robert A. M.; Mellins, Thomas; Fishman, David (1995). New York 1960: Architecture and Urbanism Between the Second World War and the Bicentennial. New York: Monacelli Press. p. 342
  • ALT2:... that a moai head was displayed in the Seagram Building's plaza in 1968 to draw attention to the artifacts on Easter Island, which were seen as endangered? Source: Chile: Economic Notes. Chilean Development Corporation. 1968. p. 5.
  • ALT2A:... that a 🗿 head was displayed in the Seagram Building's plaza in 1968 to draw attention to the artifacts on Easter Island, which were seen as endangered? Source: Chile: Economic Notes. Chilean Development Corporation. 1968. p. 5. This is a variation of the above. Does the Main Page really not prohibit emojis?
  • ALT3:... that the owner of the Seagram Building advocated for its facade and lobby to receive New York City landmark designation, but balked at the designation of a restaurant inside? Source: Dunlap, David W. (February 4, 1990). "Building Owner Fights Landmark at 4 Seasons". The New York Times
  • ALT4:... that despite the higher-than-average rents at the Seagram Building, there was a waiting list for office space three years after its completion? Source: Cuniff, John (November 12, 1961). "A New Glitter for Park Avenue". The News and Observer. p. 44.
  • ALT2A (b):... that in 1968 a 🗿 head was displayed in the Seagram Building's plaza to draw attention to the artifacts of Easter Island? Source: Chile: Economic Notes. Chilean Development Corporation. 1968. p. 5. This is a variation of the above. Does the Main Page really not prohibit emojis?

• Reviewed: Hello (Pop Smoke song)

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 00:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

• Comment - Wouldn't it be "hookier" to simply say, ... that a head was displayed in the Seagram Building's plaza in 1968? --Ykraps (talk) 08:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ykraps: That's true. I just wanted to try to use an emoji in a hook, after the use of emojis was jokingly suggested in the Wikimedia Community Discord. However, let's see what the hook reviewer thinks of the alts as well. Epicgenius (talk) 13:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: So many great hooks. Original is most concise, but I've refined ALT2A for our Emoji history making. "You ain't seen nothing yet". No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@No Swan So Fine: Thanks for the review as always. I've done a QPQ again. Epicgenius (talk) 20:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we'll have to wait for the Prep setters! No Swan So Fine (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding 108.41.129.35 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)'s comment in the edit summary of this edit:

@Epicgenius:, ArchDaily is reliable & balanced: Johnson was arch'l hack & Nazi going to Hitler's rallies in Nuremburg 1933-41 till FBI "persuaded" to stop, he stole Mies's design of Farnsworth House to make due to wealth earlier "his" Glass House that he never denied, as obvious, his "contribution" to Seagram design were min. in office furniture & interiors of restaurants; Kahn designed less & Jacobs next to 0. All 3 do not belong to the same sentence w/ Mies, as ArchDaily presents.

I agree that Mies was the main architect. The main reason that I had restored Johnson and Kahn & Jacobs's names was because their specific contributions are mentioned further down in the article. I have no comment on Johnson's motivations here, but he did have a more than nominal role, as he designed the interiors of the building. It seems that, at least for a while, he did have a leadership role as Mies was not licensed to practice architecture in New York (as cited in Mertins, Detlef (2014). Mies. p. 341). Kahn & Jacobs seem to have had the least contribution to the Seagram Building's design, though.

Regarding my edit summary here, it was poorly written; sorry about that. I meant to say that there are already reliable sources in the article, not that ArchDaily wasn't reliable. In hindsight, I should've moved down the ArchDaily reference per WP:CITELEAD, since the lead section is meant to be a summary of information that is already cited in the body. – Epicgenius (talk) 12:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Johnson, Kahn & Jacobs were not assisting Rohe in the design were it counted due to insufficient skills to contribute to that part of the design, which made Seagram famous. Namely conceptual design, the design of the facades, lobby, and other prominent parts. The restaurants were poorly designed and subsequently redesigned. Kahn & Jacobs were only design development contributors of not prominent parts (narrowly specialized design consultants), as it is typical in arch'l offices. The principal designer rarely does them. Jacobs could not design well at all. Kahn's design "achievement" of Municipal Asphalt Plant is based on earlier design of Hangar d' Orly by Eugène Freyssinet.

I worked in an arch'l office in NYC area for a similar licensed architect who was an assistant to Marcel Breuer for 20 yrs and must have sharpened pencils, as neither he nor his design director, also licensed, could not design anything spatial. Another architect was not capable to design a penthouse in an apt bldg proposal for Bangkok, incl. the structure. I have a copy of a book w/ his "achievements" with my design where also incl'd his alleged contributions to Four Seasons Hotel New York design showing the lobby by... I. M. Pei while his were only suits, as he specialized in them and for anything else had design consultants. Such were also Kahn & Jacobs.

Johnson was more skilled in design, but not to be a pionier, as Mies. Seagram's interiors by Johnson were mediocre and most likely not by him personally, but by somebody hired, as myself, and possibly gay. All Johnson's "oeuvre" looks, like mishmash of works of different people. If not for the Mies's part, Seagram Bldg would have been unknown. That is the key reason not to include the names of those 3 in the lead. They were not up to Mies's level in any respect or proximity.

On the other hand, Mies was an aesthetician who did not care much for functionality, e.g. in Neue Nationalgalerie, and also a conformist who lived in a traditional, post Edwardian era, apt in Chicago w/ all the comfort of ample drapery & clutter and none of austerity of modernism he promoted. I was studying arch. in Wroclaw and lived across the street from WUWA (Breslau), which is next to Centennial Hall (Wrocław) (to the right on the map). Mies was dissected over & over.

Non-European view on Mies's "co-workers" is exaggerated. They were just fillers where Mies was too lazy or uninterested to put effort into design outside of aesthetics. Their co-work does not maka them co-designers or even collaborators. They were just hired hands for convenience due to a lack of arch'l license, desire to deal with interior functions or design, getting commissions. So they got a bone bigger or smaller. But the design where it counts is by Mies only, as ArchDaily writes.

Johnson's & Kahn's WP's articles should not mention that they were Mies's design assistants in Seagram, as it is not true, but only in the body as "assistants" and not "design assistants", as that might be true, as in the case of my former boss assisting Breuer. Cheers!--108.41.129.35 (talk) 23:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This is a genuinely helpful insight. I'll check the article's sources again, see whether I overstated the importance of Kahn & Jacobs and Johnson in the article. You're right that it's Mies alone who was responsible for the core aspects of the design. Though, as far as I can tell, Johnson had a more-than-nominal role in the design (even if his interiors were mediocre, which indeed they were, in my opinion). – Epicgenius (talk) 00:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: very useful is the Mies documentary. It shows how ugly were the restaurants. No sense of proportions, as in proj's, e.g. by Meier, where you feel, like in Javits Center. Johnson decided to beautify the Four Season restaurant and commissioned Mark Rothko to paint 9 panels. Rothko, an ardent communist, thought the panels are for everybody to see and not only the wealthy patrons. After realizing they are not, he returned the fee and eventually donated them to Tate Modern (Rothko: ...). And those were Johnson's best. His role was not nominal, but his output was sub-standard and thus irrelevant to the fame of the bldg the article is about and not about who designed, e.g. the basement or roofing. Who cares! No respected arch'l historian mentions Johnson in re Seagram design. They criticize him by not mentioning. That is the indicator of his no role in the design where it counted. Silence speaks volumes. Good luck.--108.41.129.35 (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]