I agree the information pertaining to the sage wall is lacking a secondary or academic source, I attempted to find any mention on google scholar, research gate, etc. Nonetheless it is a genuine physical formation that now has cultural significance, as I am sure you are aware. I appreciate you not forwarding the article for deletion. In this context, is there anything else I can do to ameliorate the lack of a secondary source? i would hope soon a legitimate organization would publish information on the wall, but if not I am at loss as to what to do. I made sure to mention the lack of any academic legitimacy pertaining to claims of man made origins. I also did my best to correct the bare URL citations, if this is insufficient or incorrect I will fix as soon as possible. Thank you for your assistance. Eternallygr8fu1 (talk) 19:47, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made some improvements and will now try removing the issues block and move the article back into mainspace. John.Farquhar (talk) 19:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to help as this needs to get published. John.Farquhar (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]