Rani Mukerji filmography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on August 22, 2014.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 12, 2014 Featured list candidate Promoted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 6, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Rani Mukerji (pictured) is the only Bollywood actress to win both the Filmfare Award for Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress in the same year?

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Indian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have made the page better. Please see if you agree. I think we should list all her known awards next to each performance which tells everyone which performance of her was most appreciated in terms of awards. We should keep this format on here like all the A-list Hollywood actresses have it on their pages.

This is in the running for FLC, and no FL-class filmography page has such a format! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Daan0001: Per the format endorsed at WP:FILMOGRAPHY, the most important awards are mentioned in the notes section. So do not remove this from a FL that is on the main page today! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 10:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lady Lotus: Please discuss here, before reverting. If you have any issues, raise them on the FL-talk page or the WP:FILMOGRAPHY talk page, because my edit has been validated by both of them. Thanks. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 11:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to edit war about this but if there wasn't a separate awards page then I would say keep them because they are no where else, but since she has a completely separate article for her awards (List of awards and nominations received by Rani Mukerji) then there is no need to keep them on this page. This page is specific to her filmography, not her awards, it's the whole point of having them separate too is to not have repeating information on multiple pages. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lady Lotus: Then why even mention the directors, the language of the films, etc etc? There are separate pages for all of those. Cherry-picking one aspect and removing them is highly unfair, especially when WP:FILMOGRAPHY explicitly states that "additional information such as medium, episode titles, or awards--when there is no separate "Awards" section in the given article". I am simply following the policy used in that article. So, in this case, only the most notable film award (Filmfare) is included in that column so we know the awards she won for her most important films. So please revert back, and garner consensus on whether this policy needs to be changed. None of the FLC reviewers found a fault with this, so why make a hue and cry over this now? -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 11:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"when there is no separate "Awards" section in the given article", I don't think that WP:FILMOGRAPHY is taking into account if the actors awards has a separate page. Like I said, if there weren't a separate page, then yes keep them, but since there is a whole other page on it, it doesnt make since to keep it. The title of her page isn't "...., filmography and awards", it's just filmography, so it should be specific to it. And maybe they didn't make a hue over this because they didn't think of it at the time, or it wasn't on their list of things needing to fix, I wasn't there so I couldn't have shared my opinion. I'm not trying to be unfair or trying to remove the awards permanently, they have their own section on her awards page, I'm not deleting those or saying they have no merit. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lady Lotus: That is not the point. "Because they didn't think of it at the time" is not a valid reason to change existing policy. If you have a problem with a policy, discuss on their talk page, and don't cherry-pick a random article to implement the change only because it "doesn't make sense to you". If we unanimously decide to not include any awards on the notes section, then I will be happy to remove it myself. Until then, it's better to leave it the way it is. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 11:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it is an FA now, doesn't mean things cannot be changed on it. "Rani Mukerji filmography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.". My intentions are of good faith, please know that I'm not trying to sabotage the page or make it any less of the article that it is. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not accusing you of sabotaging the page at all. I have always admired your work out here, and have no bad faith towards your edit. All I am saying is that let the article be until there is consensus from other editors on what needs to be done. That's the way Wikipedia functions. If there is disagreement, ask others. Till then, let it be the way it was. So I am requesting you to add back the contents you removed, and let's ask others to weigh in. Is that acceptable? -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 12:04, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Totally. And I never meant to insinuate you thought I was sabotaging, I was just putting it out there so you didn't think I would :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:14, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. I get it. Thank you. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 12:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to some articles Biyer Phool released in 1992. However I think that is a mistake. I found some reliable sources which write 1996. Here are the articles.

• They write 1996 in Indrani Haldar filmography, who was the leading actress in Biyer Phool [1]
• https://spuul.com/stars/95-rani-mukerji

Other reasons why I think that Biyer Phool released in 1996

• Rani Mukerji does not look like 14 in the film
• Biyer Phool was disturbed by Shree Venkatesh Films, which was founded in 1996
• Mukerji keeps saying that she started her career with 17
• Various videos of the film/songs are mentioning 1996 as the release year
• This would make more sense " And you may not believe this but even my father did not want me to join films. Salim (Akhtar) uncle, who was very close to my family, came with the offer of Aa Gale Lag Jaa in 1994, but my father was aghast. He immediately turned it down." [2]--Shwayze  ^sing♪ 20:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a WP: RS to change the information. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 14:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I already have --Shwayze  ^sing♪ 15:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

None of them are reliable sources, and you did not garner any consensus, so you cannot just go and change it again. If you keep doing it, you'll be blocked from editing. So stop, and look for a good enough source. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 15:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just cleaned up some movies which were not related to Rani Mukherji (E.g. Fanna, Pyaar Kiya To Darna Kya, Hum Aapke Dil Mein Rehte Hain, Gadar: Ek Prem Katha and more). I cross checked everywhere so please leave your comment below if you think it was my mistake and how. Thank You – GSS (talk) 06:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. An IP has been vandalizing this list for days now. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for recovering the orginal contents it was a mess. Cheers – GSS (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i like for store cool — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.189.242.191 (talk) 18:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rani Mukerji filmography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140410013518/http://www.sify.com/movies/bollywood/preview.php?ctid=5&cid=2419&id=13150564 to http://www.sify.com/movies/bollywood/preview.php?ctid=5&cid=2419&id=13150564

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]