This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An image is requested for this article as its inclusion will substantially increase the significance of the article. Please remove the image-needed parameter once the image is added. Video games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention YouTube Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject YouTube To-do: A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see list. Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles Cleanup : See cleanup listing Maintain : This WikiProject Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles Other : Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Berrely, thanks for examining the page. Could you please take another look at The Verge, Polygon, and Kotaku? The first two are greenlit at WP:RSP, and Kotaku doesn't have an entry but is used as a reference at RSP, which seems a pretty strong indicator. All three articles are entirely about the RTGame channel, so I don't see WP:SIGCOV concerns, and because they're entirely different news cycles WP:BLP1E is off the table. If you agree, feel free to move back to mainspace. If not, could you articulate the specific concerns you have with each reference, as well as each of the other news articles currently cited? {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sdkb and sorry for taking a while to reply (school break and all). I was mainly going off WP:ENT, thought it is part of additional criteria. The 3 sources mentioned are all reliable (my wording was quite confusing, I wasn't intending to reference those sources), thought 3 reliable sources does seem to be borderline on notability. I'm not too good with YouTuber notability so if you feel that it does pass it's relevant guideline (which would be WP:ENT), you can go ahead and move it yourself to the mainspace. — Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 10:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Sbkb should not move this to mainspace, as the article creator when the article has already been through AFD and deleted for lack of notability. The only change since the deletion is the addition of two sources focused on videos he did for Hitman 3. Neither article discusses the subject in-depth. 3 sources is extremely weak for a BLP. -- ferret (talk) 12:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Berrely, thanks for the reply, and no worries about the wikibreak. I'm not super familiar with WP:ENT either, but as you mentioned it's an optional alternative for GNG rather than a replacement for it, and since this meets GNG I'm going to go ahead and restore the page.

Ferret, the added sources are central to the argument for notability, as there was wide agreement at the previous AfD that The Verge qualified as one source for GNG, and Polygon/Kotaku are similar, so the "multiple" requirement of GNG is now met. There is no requirement to go through AfC when recreating an article if the circumstances have meaningfully changed as they have here, so while I abided by your draftification, if you continue to have concerns at this point, a new AfD would be the proper venue to voice them. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 16:33, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know the relevance of Daniel's "Drift King" title among his following and community, but I don't think it's important enough to be included in this article. FranzBarron (talk) 05:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As it's a common joke in the community, and the fact it's already there, I think it may as well be included. I mean, why remove it? 72.0.152.19 (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]