Protocarnivorous plant has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 18, 2007 Good article nominee Listed May 15, 2007 Peer review Reviewed February 17, 2010 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Carnivorous plants: Plants High‑importance Protocarnivorous plant is within the scope of WikiProject Carnivorous plants, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to carnivorous plants. For more information, visit the project page.Carnivorous plantsWikipedia:WikiProject Carnivorous plantsTemplate:WikiProject Carnivorous plantscarnivorous plant High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Mid-importance).

I have a small (and probably obsessive) semantic beef with the sentence, "Some contend that their intended purpose is to aid in pollination, adhering seeds to visiting pollinators." I know it is an easy linguistic trap, but my understanding is that evolution doesn't actually "intend" anything. Rather, "accidental" mutations become advantageous. I don't really know the scholarship on carnivorous plants, but this part seems like it could use an edit. maxsch 05:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not obsessive at all! I've been looking for some quality, nitpicky feedback on this. And you're absolutely right. I'm by no means a writer so I appreciate those who point out my mistakes. (Hopefully I can avoid them in the future.) After reviewing that sentence, it sure was an easy linguistic trap to fall into. I'm glad you caught it. Feel free to fix whatever else you might find! --Rkitko ^(talk) 12:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Darlingtonia californica article, it's now considered a true carnivore. Andrewa (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]