This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hinduism: Philosophy High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Philosophy task force (assessed as High-importance). India: Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Philosophy: Literature / Religion / Eastern / Ancient Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature Philosophy of religion Eastern philosophy Ancient philosophy

This article lacks proper formatting can anybody help? Lokesh 2000 12:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadshot888: Why are you deleting sources, as you did here, here and here? Please see wikipedia policies and guidelines. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ms Sarah Welch: : Everything shared is wrong. Moreover the sanskrit translation is wrong, i have read them a long back, taught me by a guru plus i am from country who's heritage is you talking about, so from my knowledge the corrections i made was legit, western-scholars mis-understood everything, this wrong info guides countless of people to opposite direction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadshot888 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadshot888: You are free to believe in whatever you want, but wikipedia is not your blog, see WP:WWIN. We rely on published sources. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ms Sarah Welch:: since not my blog so you decide to spread wrong stuff related to my own heritage to my own people ? lol ? ATLEAST correct the sanskrit translations the stuff is wrong, look at the language they use, "belief" , "embellished". it is false. Everything shared over there is "misunderstood" form of my own people's study. oh yea on the blog i thought wikipedia is platform for all ? no ? alright but for good's sake, at-least research on what is written oh wait how can you research, you guys believe in western-scholars, not being offensive but the stuff they share is wrong, i don't know it is "on-purpose" or they are really stupid. :) Take care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadshot888 (talk • contribs)