This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide
GA on hold
"fears it would be biased towards critics of climate change, despite the fact that the programme was in development for 18 months" - I don't get it. It could be critical and be in development for a long time...
Might look better if you take the refs out of the lead
No relevant images? (I wouldn't be surprised if there aren't)
You don't need to say that the language of refs is English. This is the English Wikipedia :)
Newspaper titles in refs (Guardian, Sun, etc.) need to be in italics (and wlink all publishers if possible please, but that's not necessary)
"Another critic, director of Friends of the Earth Tony Juniper said," - need a comma before his name, I think