This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Endangered languages (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Sweden Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

@Tropylium: I have two sources, Wilbur's A grammar of Pite Saami and Sjaggo's Pitesamisk grammatik, both available online. These two sources give different forms for the illative and comitative singular forms of o-stem nouns. In the first source, the final vowel is given just as o in these forms, with no umlaut of the stem. In the second source, the final vowel of these forms is u, and umlaut of the stem is triggered, like in neighbouring Lule Sami. Is one of them wrong, or is this a dialect difference? I don't think it would do to simply list both forms in this article, as it would lead readers to think they are simply two alternative forms, while we don't actually know what's going on. Rua (mew) 20:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The table of consonants doesn't show any overlong consonants, which are present in Lule and Northern Sami. Do they not occur in Pite Sami? Rua (mew) 00:14, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent article (July 2019) on Pite Saami and one of its speakers. -Yupik (talk) 22:36, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The document that presents the official standard orthography describes two sounds that are not present in Wilbur's phonology, namely long e and u. Wilbur states that /e/ diphthongises to /ie/ in stressed syllables, but no mention is made of the long e phoneme in words like dedij "knew", which is most definitely distinct from the ie diphthong in biena "dog". The statement therefore seems false, and /eː/ needs to be distinguished from /ie/. Secondly, the document also distinguishes short from long u, which Wilbur also does not do. The words buhtjiv ("milked", short u) and buhtiv ("came", long u) are distinguished by the length of the vowel. These vowels have different etymological origins, coming from a Proto-Samic short vowel and diphthong respectively. Rua (mew) 13:05, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]