Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Pipe major

Warrant Officer and SNCO

A Warrant Officer in the British Army is not a Senior Non-Commissioned Officer, but a separate series of ranks between that of the NCO and commissioned officer. --Panzer71 (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Pipe MajorPipe major – Article is about the common noun. Such terms of rank are capitalised only when used as a proper noun, ie, in the title and name of an officebearer. Bjenks (talk) 06:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments:
The standard rule (per Hart's Rules, p. 26, is that "Words for titles and ranks are generally lower-case unless they are used before a name, as a name, or in forms of address." This means that the following forms are correctly capitalised: Pipe Major McTavish; Talk to (McTavish) our Pipe Major; Dear Pipe Major McTavish. The following forms are correctly written in lower-case: McTavish is a pipe major, one of dozens of pipe majors in the service. The rule is exactly the same for any rank. How many privates are there in the regiment, how many generals? But—Private Simpson, General Macarthur. If you look up, e.g., "major general" at p. 227 in the New Oxford Dictionary for Writers and Editors, it specifies lower-case for "army and US air force rank (cap. in titles, abbrev. Maj. Gen.}" Both of the cited references are explicitly careful to consider common usage as well as educated precedents. Bjenks (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.