This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tree of Life Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Petrosedum forsterianum

• ... that the rock stonecrop (pictured) can go in a soup as well as on a roof?

• • ALT1: ... that the garden use of the rock stonecrop (pictured) is limited by the high speed of its growth? Source: "... this species is much too rampant for a rock garden." Stephenson (1994), p. 120
  • ALT2: ... that the rock stonecrop (pictured) is too rampant for a rock garden?
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Brian Driscoll

Surtsicna (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• Article created 9 February. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are all interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go. Thriley (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Surtsicna: It seems to have been named after an "Edward Forster", see [1]. (I was curious because it seemed old enough to be connected to Johann Reinhold Forster or Georg Forster, who have many taxa named in their honour, but most of them are "forsteri". See also my current FAC Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Johann Reinhold Forster/archive1). —Kusma (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will include it in the article. Thanks! Surtsicna (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is it Edward Forster the Younger? —Kusma (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! The Etymological Dictionary of Succulent Plant Names confirms it. Surtsicna (talk) 19:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]