This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

International relations: United Nations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations. Palestine High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

After the vote goes ahead tomorrow, I would suggest scrapping the column "UN membership position" and replacing it with the vote results for the upgrade. That way, we can let the details column do the talking when it comes to each state's position on membership. Keep in mind that the campaign for actual membership is still ongoing, and this is just one step. The article should still describe the overall campaign to gain membership. Nightw 10:52, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I was actually planning on doing exactly that. TDL (talk) 18:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The map aggregates in a way the three tallies we have - diplomatic recognition, vote in 2011, vote in 2012. Colors are according to combination of two parameters: "Recognition/No recognition" and "vote". For "vote" the UNGA/2012 vote position is taken when different from the UNESCO/2011 vote position (as more recent). If a state had not voted in 2012 (absent or not a member), then the 2011 vote position is utilized. If the state had not voted in 2011 either (absent, not a member, intelligible to vote) it's colored only according to recognition/no recognition.

• Dark green is for recognition + yes vote: most of the recognizers
• Light green is for recognition + abstain vote: Paraguay, Malawi, DR Congo, Papua New Guinea, Liberia, Togo, Rwanda, Bosnia, Mongolia, Ukraine, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Montenegro, Slovakia, Hungary, Vanuatu
• Dark blue is for no-recognition + yes vote: Mexico, Jamaica, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, South Sudan, Eritrea, Myanmar, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, New Zealand, Ireland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Portugal, Spain, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy, Greece, Austria, Armenia, Japan
• Light blue is for no-recognition + abstain vote: Guatemala, Slovenia, Haiti, Bahamas, Barbados, Kiribati, Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, Cook Islands, Croatia, Monaco, Andorra, San Marino, Netherlands, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, UK, Germany, Moldova, Macedonia, South Korea, Singapore, Cameroon, Colombia, Australia
• Orange is for recognition + against vote: Czech Republic
• Red is for no-recognition + against vote: Israel, USA, Palau, Micronesia, Marshall Islands, Panama, Canada, Nauru
• Gray (the remaining) is for no-recognition + not voted: Niue and all who aren't members of UN or UNESCO (Holy See, SMOM, EU, states with limited recognition)

Disclaimer: neither recognition or lack of recognition, nor past votes on the same or different questions forces the states to vote in the same way in the future votes in UNSC, UNGA and other organizations. Japinderum (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is nice and it is accurate, but the doubling of status makes it hard to get one's head round! It didn't help that there were two sessions, one in 2011 and the other in 2012. The Big Hoof! (talk) 18:27, 7 July 2013 (UTC) Struck out sock. bobrayner (talk) 05:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Palestine 194 which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.avaaz.org/en/independence_for_palestine_9/

  Triggered by \bavaaz\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Palestine 194. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110829115339/http://www.france24.com/en/20110828-palestinians-see-progress-eu-stance-un-bid to http://www.france24.com/en/20110828-palestinians-see-progress-eu-stance-un-bid
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110924080533/http://www.ynetnews.com:80/articles/0,7340,L-4125110,00.html to http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4125110,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Palestine 194. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110831172441/http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=235781 to http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=235781
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.arabstoday.net/en/kuwait-supports-palestines-unesco-membership.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141011202654/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/07/state-of-palestine_n_2425682.html to http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/07/state-of-palestine_n_2425682.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UN members are entitled whether to vote for or against the Palestinian statehood recognition at the UN

Of course, Ban Ki Moon is not a native speaker of English but the intrusioon of 'whether' here is a grating solecism. I don't doubt the source transcribed his words literally, but if another exists that paraphrases it in a way consonant with English usage, that would be better.Nishidani (talk) 06:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]