Oliver B. Shallenberger was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 12, 2020 Good article nominee Listed February 26, 2023 Good article reassessment Delisted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 27, 2017. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Oliver B. Shallenberger invented the first successful electric meter (pictured), predecessor to the modern meter used today?
Current status: Delisted good article

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Pennsylvania Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Electrical engineering Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Energy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Invention Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Media Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

The following pictures are available on the German Wiki page for Shallenberger, but I don't know how to import the pictures to the English page for Shallenberger.

Please import these pictures of Shallenberger and his watt-hour meter. Greensburger (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After a few run-ins with the copyright cops, I'm not even going to try to transfer these here. These files aren't on Commons, appear to be on the German Wikipedia under fair-use, and the combination of quirky German translation by Google and my lack of copyright law expertise has me cowed. Perhaps someone will find the originals of these images in the Library of Congress (that's a very large place to search) and upload them here as either free images or cop-resistant fair use images. --Wtshymanski (talk) 22:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I have asked the Library of Congress and they are working on it. Will get back to y'all on this later.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 16:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I got the Shallenberger picture from a 1914 publication (public domain if before 1923). I got Shallenberger's meter from the Library of Congress. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  

 Done 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oliver B. Shallenberger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 20:50, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1. Prose ✓ Pass

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

1.

• It's fine to use alternating current and AC, but you just need to put (AC) after the first mention of alternating current, to make it clear the abbreviation means the same thing.

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Link flagship

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "Shallenberger ran the experiments of alternating current apparatus which had been imported from Europe." - This doesn't quite read right, can you rephrase this?

 Done - rewrote accordingly. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "resign from the Westinghouse company but he continued" - Should company be capitalized?

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• George Westinghouse is a duplink

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "One thing led to another and eventually a few weeks later he built the first alternating current measuring meter." - Not quite encyclopedic tone here

 Done - reworded accordingly. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "In 1888 Elihu Thomson patented a walking-beam meter," - Comma after 1888

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Is there a way you can combine the Later life and death and Personal life sections? Those are both super short sections.

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2.

• Ref 12 is dead

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Look on WorldCat for the OCLC numbers for the pre-ISBN sources. For instance, here's the link for Jordan 1914 [1]. The OCLC is in the details section

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3.

• Is cause of death known?

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4.

5.

6.

7.

• I don't think the hatnote is necessary. The first and middle name of a person being the same as the first and last name of another isn't really a confusion point. For instance, there's no hatnote to George Washington at George Washington Carver.

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Consider adding an infobox person. This isn't a GA requirement, but it would be nice.

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hog Farm: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look now. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. Hog Farm (talk) 14:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]