This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Urban studies and planning This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: Nebraska Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

The article currently states "the city had neglected many of the neighborhoods, leading to decreased police response times". If you are neglecting a neighborhood, the time it takes to respond should go up, not down. I assume this should read "leading to longer police response times" instead, but I did not want to change it without someone else looking at it, as I do not have the data to support it either way. 71.15.80.214 (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, where is North Omaha, Nebraska? Why is there a separate article? There is not now, nor has there ever been, a place named North Omaha, Nebraska. (In contrast, there actually WAS a town called South Omaha, Nebraska, but it has since been annexed.) This article would lead me to believe there is a separate suburb by this name, when that is not the case. - Unsigned comment

Sounds like a mad observer. Feel free to read any of the articles about North Omaha and then comment on its non-existence. And sign your posts, please. - Freechild 03:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, some green roadsigns on I-80, I-680, and I-29S specifically point to "North Omaha." 69.58.224.75 (talk) 10:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is really a moot conversation at this point. Neighborhoods in Omaha, Nebraska really answers the question I think the anon user above was posing. • Freechild'sup? 13:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous IP has been editing this article lately, and has deleted the zip code 68104 from the demographics table. This radically alters the demographic makeup of the area, which the editor accommodated for by recalculating the statistics.

The dilemma is that although 68104, which is primarily Benson, does not actively associate itself with N.O., it is actively associated with the area via the local media. Other communities in North Omaha distinguish themselves this way include Dundee, Florence, East Omaha, the Gold Coast area (Cathedral neighborhood), Creighton University, and the Raven Oaks area.

History shows that the historical identification of North Omaha revolves around its racial composition, and I think that's where the anonymous editor was coming from. However, the media actively portrays North Omaha as anything east of 72nd, and north of Dodge. That's a lot of territory with a lot of white folks. I'm beginning to wonder if there needs to be a separate article to emphasize the African American history of Omaha.

Here's what's up for consideration. Make any additions or deletions:

• Benson
• Dundee
• Florence
• East Omaha
• Gold Coast
• Creighton University
• Raven Oaks area.

- Freechild 21:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To me the true North Omaha is just in fact North East Omaha. It goes from 16th St in the east to 30th St in the west, and starts at around Cuming St in the south and extends as far north as Redick Ave. Dolph72 07:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However, your contention about "true" North Omaha has to be supported by citations. The area you describe in terms of being from 16th to 30th, then north to Kountze Park, was formerly called "Near North Omaha. I'll be writing an article on that soon. The areas between Near North Omaha and the Minne Lusa neighborhood have their own distinct names as well, including Saratoga and Miller Park. Luckily for North Omaha the mainstream media does not define historic community boundaries - only modern ones. - Freechild 13:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are only considering modern community boundries then of course you must include the new designation NoDo (North Downtown) which consists of 293 acres on 80 city blocks according to the Greater Omaha Economic Development Partnership. Dolph72 20:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. I am really only concerned with historical designations; however, if this can be cited it should be added as well. It should also go on the Neighborhoods in Omaha, Nebraska article. - Freechild 20:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another community that may be of interest would be the Bemis Park Community. It was established in 1889 and has some wonderful architecture. I have some pictures I can upload if it would be of interest Dolph72 17:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:F0jqpu79d has been editing Neighborhoods of Omaha, Nebraska to reflect the boundary of North Omaha as Read Street rather than Ponca Road. For the sake of conversation, I would like to challenge the assertion that the boundary of North Omaha is that far south. I am a proponent of seeing north Omaha as a geographic area of Omaha, similar to some ongoing popular conversation. I believe the neighborhood that where the boundary is being confused with is the one between the Minne Lusa and Florence, which was historically Vane Street. It would be great to read other editors' thoughts. • Freechild'sup? 13:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not confusing any boundary with Minne Lusa, which is a neighborhood association http://www.mpml-neighborhood-assoc.org. Its northern boundary is neither Read nor Vane (which still exists and is one block south of Read). The northern boundary of Minne Lusa is Craig Street (well into the Florence Community Area). Florence is not a neighborhood it is a Community area. Community Areas and Sub-community Areas are not neighborhoods, they contain multiple neighborhoods. These are broader geographic area like Midtown, Downtown, Florence, East Omaha, North Omaha, Near North, Near South, South Omaha, West Omaha, South West Omaha, Millard, North West Omaha, Irvington, Elkhorn, etc. Each and every one of these geographically defined Community Areas and Sub-community Areas has multiple neighborhoods inside of them.

I would like to challenge that Ponca Road is far north of the Community areas of North Omaha and of Florence; it is inside yet another Community Area called Ponca Hills. Ponca Road is 2 1/2 miles north of I-680 and 4 miles north of Read Street. The boundary of North Omaha is this far south (Read Street) at all points east of 40th Street - otherwise the boundary is I-680. North of I-680 is the Ponca Hills Community area.

Read Street is specifically the old (original) boundary between the City of Omaha and the City of Florence. Of course, in 1917 Omaha annexed Florence, but the area is still a very distinct Community Area, or Sub-community Area, which has its own neighborhoods. This is the same as the many other Community Areas that were cities annexed by Omaha. Furthermore, if you look currently at 30th Street on a map you will notice that Read Street is the “pivot-point” at which the angles of the streets between these two cities notably change.

Read Street is verified as an original/historical boundary of the unique Community Area of Florence on plat map (page 61) of the 1889 Plat Book of Douglas and Sarpy County http://www.memories.ne.gov/u?/opl,863 Also, Read Street, as well as 40th Street, is verified as a Community Area boundary on the Index Map of the 1918 Baist's Real Estate Atlas http://www.memories.ne.gov/u?/opl,1805 Florence has always been a unique Community Area of its own, not a neighborhood. Again, it is a geographically defined Community Area which has multiple neighborhoods of its own.

I am also a proponent of seeing North Omaha as a geographic area of the city, but it is also a Community Area that is distinct from other Community Areas such as Florence, and Midtown.

For example: The Near South Community Area is geographically in the southern part of the city but that does not make it South Omaha. Both of these areas are distinct and contain multiple different neighborhoods. Likewise, Midtown, Florence, Millard, Elkhorn, Irvington and every other Community Area and Sub-community Area that has been named previously are each distinct geographical areas which contain multiple different neighborhoods. F0jqpu79d (talk) 11:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know Omaha or North Omaha, but the above sounds rather compelling. I think we should use documented sources for boundary definitions, and then add narrative (with sources) if there is a reason to describe how "informal" boundaries have changed. The description of the way the streets shift at the pivot point is one of the ways physical boundaries are markers of neighborhoods.--Parkwells (talk) 12:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

F0jqpu79d, thank you for responding to my request - I really appreciate your thoughtfulness on the subject. If you look at the page history of Neighborhoods in Omaha, Nebraska you will find that I wrote most of the page - as well as almost all of the other pages on WP about the individual neighborhoods in Omaha, including finding the research that supports the information included therein. Because of that, and my scholarly work as well, I am thoroughly well-acquainted with historical and contemporary definitions of neighborhoods and community areas in Omaha.

Because of this I would challenge your assertion that Florence or Ponca Hills constitutes community areas in and of themselves. If [[WP:RS|reliable sources] can be found that historically or currently demonstrate there are recognized subsections within either neighborhood that are called neighborhoods than I will stand corrected. I am well-acquainted with the plat maps of the Florence area, as well as plat maps of Minne Lusa that are not online - but can be found at the downtown library in Omaha. The map you cited is from 1918, and was completed just before Florence was annexed. There were no streets in the south end of Florence at this period, and this was just a plat map representing possibilities.

Minne Lusa is more than a neighborhood association - it is a historical neighborhood. When the Minne Lusa neighborhood - from Weber to Redick - was developed between 1916 and 1923, the street layout changed from what was projected on the plat you cite. Looking at a modern map you will see that the street angles changed at Weber, not Read. Weber was where the town of Florence ended in 1916. Using historical material like this to support the contention that the modern boundaries are somehow the same isn't a reliable reference point. In this light using Reed as the southern end of the modern Florence boundary is arbitrary at best.

For clarity sake, let's be completely transparent and recognize that there are no community areas defined by authorities within the city of Omaha. The media and the government of Omaha, as cited throughout this article, refer to North Omaha as a gelatinous blob of anything north of Dodge and anything east of 72nd. It is becoming increasingly common for popular social conversation in Omaha to refer to anything in Omaha's black community as happening in "North Omaha", alternately demonizing and segregating the area and the people from the rest of the city's social, economic and cultural makeup - as if they can be. Recognizing the boundaries as defined by reliable sources simply attempts to withdraw those biases and build upon WP as a reliable source of information, rather than one colored by bias or discrimination.

This can be resolved with reliable sources, which I use throughout the North Omaha article. If you find alternate sources we can cite alternate perceptions; however, arbitrarily changing information as suited to personal perspective isn't okay. • Freechild'sup? 16:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One more thought: IMHO, I think that most of the neighborhoods in the region of Omaha most commonly referred to as North Omaha - including Benson, Gold Coast, Dundee, Gifford Park, Florence, Bemis Park, and East Omaha - would all cut themselves off from "North Omaha" if they had the choice. That is because of the way the area is portrayed by the media and in popular conversation, which is generally as a crime-ridden, low income African American neighborhood. This elitism is racist and classist at best, and is the choice of those neighborhoods to cut themselves off from the rich heritage that is their area's. But that choice doesn't belong on WP until there are reliable sources standing behind it. • Freechild'sup? 16:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this would be better not to have it be opinion. There are sources in the lede for the boundaries of North Omaha; it would be useful to mention them in the narrative - "as defined by xxxxx and xxxxxx." Then readers will know that much. Later narrative could address differences in definitions and how neighborhoods, communities, etc. are defined.--Parkwells (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC) I live at 68104 North 55th street which is in BensonRadioactiveplayful (talk) 18:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Radioactiveplayful[reply]

Is the length of this article an issue? - Freechild 04:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a previous student at North Omaha High School, and avid watcher of crime in the Metro area(because my parents watch the 10:00 news every night in the computer room) I would say that the section on Racism is inaccurate and biased. North Omaha IS a violent area and most of the murders happen in the area north of 42nd and Ames. I have a friend who lived at 28th and Hamilton and he not only was held at gunpoint and robbed with his girlfriend outside his house, but bullets had hit his home more than twice. This area qualifies as North Omaha because it is much farther east than say 200th street and 30th and Ames is pretty much the last area of commerce north east before you reach the river at say 0th street. I believe that the media focuses on this area because it is in dire need of attention and to warn people from straying into this area of town unaware of its risks. After the time when the North Omaha freeway was introduced, much of the white population left this area of town and businesses started to flounder. The picture at the top of this wiki is the corner of a street where they wanted businesses but there is virtually no businesses there in this city built commerce area. The inaccuracy of this page is visible when they put a DJ's quote about crime under the Racism section. This seems at least mis-categorized and petty to me. I will however admit that the Area of Florence, Omaha has the brightest future of North Omaha. This area has several safer grocery stores and long-standing businesses. The farthest northeast area of Omaha runs into the hills near Hummel Park by the Missouri River. The residential houses may be safe, however Hummel Park is notorious for being a place of murder, crime, and body stashing. Though these opinions in my paragraph may not be the most succinct, I believe that they are important issues to consider when writing an accurate representation of this area, without positive bias. HOWEVER, I believe that maintain accuracy in the long run will lead to a better understanding of this area obviously, and perhaps people with money will give more money to help interested entrepreneurs build and clearing abandoned or condemned buildings. Donations from people concerned about poverty may stem from reading accurate information. - Izardstreet 8:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Great additions/edits Freechild & Americasroof! This site is really beginning to take on a solid form. Equinox137, I appreciate your insights as well and look forward to your additions. Even though we may have differing views on some aspects of this article, I respect your input. Moreover, I do recognize that this article does not belong to a single person and therefore, subsequent corrections and additions are to be/should be expected.

I believe that we - the collective of authors who choose to contribute to a given article -- by virtue of our unique perspectives, provide a check and balance system. This ensures that accuracy is maintained and the point of view is indeed objective. With that said, I know that we can find common ground. Last, Equinox137 I hope you had a great Christmas and New Year's - and got some rest ;). Take care, all. Prometheusfire 22:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Prometheus, I did. The article looks great - far beyond anything I ever expected. I made a few minor changes, in particular to the statement "In the late 18th century near North Omaha, closer to the downtown core, was home to many working class, middle class, and upper class WASP and Jewish families." given that no one was in the Omaha area in the late 18th century. I also think that the section on "Racism" can be worked on a little by expanding the facts of the 1919 Race Riot, but there's no rush to do that. On a side note, whoever reworked this article did a beautiful job of it. Equinox137 07:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your acknowledgement, Equinox137. Reworking this article was a labor of love, and I am glad to have contributed. - Freechild 23:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the information in the zipcode breakdown of races is somewhat misleading because it creates the impression that the majority population of north Omaha as black/african american, especially since zipcode 68104 is not included in the table. 68104 encompases an extremely large area of north omaha, according to this article's definition of where north Omaha is located. Additionally, the hispanic population as tabulated by the US Census Bureau doesn't count hispanic/latino as a race, but as a nationality, so I'm almost sure the totals are wrong as they include the hispanic/latino numbers in the grand total. After just making a cursory glance at the numbers from the 2000 census from the census.gov website the percentages of whites vs blacks is closer to 48% and 45% respectively.--Blacknebraska 15:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section is confusing because in the narrative below, it includes only the numbers for African Americans, and says they are the largest minority in Omaha. It would be useful to have the numbers for Latinos there, too, and population for Omaha overall, especially as other related articles make much of the proposal for separate school districts.--Parkwells (talk) 22:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are we going to discuss this article or let it stay in NPOV hell forever? Equinox137 06:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Equinox137, Sorry for not responding for so long. Again, thank you for making an effort to work together. Regarding the use of the word progressive -- I think that I fleshed it out pretty well below. Also, as I explained on your talk page, I understand that some people may have a particular conception of the word "progressive", but I think those people need to widen their scope to get beyond just the political reference. Again, the term "Urban America" is an emerging description of the culture formally just associated with the "African-Americans. This descriptor depicts the essential "flavor" of the African-American experience, without limiting it to the bounds of race. Moreover, this term has been used for quite sometime -- and by individuals and institutions outside of the African-American community. Regarding politics/Ernie Chambers etc. - sounds interesting -- what did you have in mind? Prometheusfire 13:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. I completely understand....after all, we have to have real jobs, right???LOL.

Anyways, to buisness. Here's the issue with "progressive". The majority of the readership of Wikipedia defines progressive in the political sense (leftist or liberal), and as authors, we really have to gear it toward what the reader understands and defines (i.e. we have to provide what the customer wants). If the goal is for Wikipedia to be a reputable source of information, then we can't really tell the reader what they need to do. Personally, I think "progressive" is a loaded term for liberals to hide who they really are, but I've wasted far too much time arguing over that issue.

But from what I'm gathering, you'd like to have information included on the positive development in North Omaha, so the article doesn't make it look like it's Beruit or something. I can't blame you. Although North O has by far the highest crime rate in both Nebraska and Iowa, there have been efforts to improve the community. To solve that issue, a section needs to be written on progress that North O has made to make itself a better community.

At the same time, it also needs to be balanced by the facts of the crime that does happen there. OPD's busiest sectors are there and there's no way we can't include that information in the article.

You didn't use "urban america" you used "urban center". When I first read that, my immediate thought was "heart of the city" - which it's not either geograhpically or otherwise. Then I remembered that the term is usually used to define an 'urban center' of a nation or a region: Berlin to Germany, Kiev to the Ukraine, etc. If you'd like to get something in about the African-American community, again it would probably fit in in the body of the article, maybe in the same section concerning community progress or development. (Maybe there's a title for you - "Community Development." It's completely inaccurate to say it's a "diverse" community though...you and I both know it.

Politics - That would also be a legitmate section, especially given that North O has continously put Chambers in the unicam since 1970. This is an area where "progressive" would probably fit, although personally I think the term is BS. I won't mess with it if it were used though. Over the next few days, I'll make some gradual revisions to outline what I have in mind. I'm gonna get a real life and take Christmas off :) Let me know what you think when you see them. Equinox137 09:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You really do have to get rid of:

and is considered the urban center and one of Omaha's most progressive communities.

That statement is loaded and has no citation. I've written a couple articles to this neighborhood (it incidentally is a "neighborhood" and not a community) My articles are Mormon Bridge (Omaha) and Malcolm X House Site. Whenever I see such an unsourced reference I equate the phrase as being politically correct for a neighborhood filled with failed inner city initiatives. The history of the neighborhood is very interesting and Malcolm X carries it into world class attention. Let the history do the talking and don't try to PC it. Americasroof 15:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With the recent additions of citations to this article I would like to remove the NPOV tag. Freechild 18:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. Moving forward; advancing. 2. Proceeding in steps; continuing steadily by increments: progressive change. 3. Promoting or favoring progress toward better conditions or new policies, ideas, or methods:a progressive politician; progressive business leadership.

Despite the fact that there are some unfortunate happenings in North Omaha, there has been an increased and concerted effort to revitalize and advance the conditions of North Omaha. These efforts are coming from both inside the community and from those external to North Omaha. The focus has varied in scope -- from improving the aesthetics, to the promoting the culture; from generating new business to fostering great social responsiveness. All of the measures taken in North Omaha have been measured, incremental and forward moving. In a word...progressive. As such, it behooves the contributors to the North Omaha article not to be one-dimensional in their approach by just focusing things like "crime rate" or "race".

Prometheusfire 03:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Ok. We're starting to get on the right track. Here's the problem. You might think North Omaha is progressive. You might want that... However, there are plenty of people in Omaha, especially residents of North Omaha that disagree with you. Therefore that is not an NPOV statement. There's no problem detailing those efforts and measures, which is why I never removed them. Besides that, I never focused on just the crime rate or race, however you can't bury the facts either. Equinox137 03:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In your last revision, you stated that "We had a compromise that we would leave the editing alone until we have discussed this...Badgadani (sp), can you also comply with that as well? Thanks in advance." Badgadani was getting to the same point that I was, that "progressive" used in that context usually means "liberal" or "leftist." Now we can probably agree that North Omaha is one of the more liberal communities in the Omaha metro. Why not add a section about politics, Ernie Chambers, etc? Equinox137 15:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The biography of Tillie Olsen notes she came from a Russian Jewish and Socialist family in North Omaha - that's what was called a Progressive background in the early 20th century. When I saw references in this article to North Omaha as Progressive, I associated it with the early 20th c. labor movements strongly influenced by such Russian Jewish families, of which there were many in North Omaha then. Olsen was a labor organizer in packinghouses before the Depression (I think) - if she was, there were probably others, and maybe some of them also came from North Omaha. There must have been more of that kind of labor history in Omaha before the disappearance of jobs in the mid to late 20th century.--Parkwells (talk) 23:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)--Parkwells (talk) 12:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who says North Omaha is "one of Omaha's most progressive communities"? ...and what does "the urban center" even mean? I'd love to see a reliable source cited on this one! I know something about North Omaha, and Omaha's current revitalization, and I must say, these claims are news to me!  :-) I would definitely agree that the Northside has a rich and diverse culture. But as far as progress, there's a lot more to North Omaha than the area around Creighton. It'll take a lot more than decentralized public housing and a new computer lab for the Washington library to make it one of Omaha's "most progressive" communities-- if such a thing even could really be measured objectively.

How is it diverse if it's primarily African-American? Equinox137 08:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I would not consider North Omaha to be a "neighborhood," but rather a suburb. In fact, North Omaha comprises a number of neighborhoods, or subdivisions.

Suburb? Are you kidding? Do you live there? North Omaha is as inner city as it gets. Equinox137 08:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I-680, runs along the Northern edge of North Omaha, not I-480.

One more thing. Why do we say that it boasts a rich and diverse culture "though" it's predominately African American? I see no absolutely incompatibility between these two facts! Personally, I rather wouldn't pay homage to racial segregation by citing the fact. Nonetheless, it is a fact, and that's what Wikipedia is for. --Jack 06:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Follow up comment: I guess that my use of suburb does not conform to the popular definition. However, the sense conveyed by the word neighborhood suggests something much closer to the subdivision level. This is inadequate, because, as stated earlier, North Omaha comprises a number of neighborhoods and subdivisions. Precinct seems to fit well, but carries a connotation of official recognition. Districts, on the other hand, are often unofficial. While again semewhat ambiguous, district seems most appropriate here. --Jack 06:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I would have to agree that Florence nor North Omaha qualify as suburbs. Florence used to be its own town I believe, but to say its a "suberb" is to say Dundee or Benson is as well. Not only that but this area was closest to the river, probably one of the catalysts in the beginning of Omaha long ago. Equinox137 is very wise in asking why this area qualifies as an area of diversity. I've talked to people who have stated that Omaha is the most segregated town in the whole region of Nebraska/Iowa. I didn't see any latinos or asians in this area of town when I went to high school there. The majority of students were black or white.

--Izardstreet 09:02, 01 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Izardstreet (talk • contribs)

For all of you anons accusing me of vandalism, you need to look up Wikipedia's policy on vandalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism) and you will find I am committing no such thing. I have provided all the sources consisent with policy. Furthermore, if you actually read through Wikipedia's original research policy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research), NPOV policy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view), verifibility policy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability) and weasel word policy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words), you will discover you are violating all four of those policies.

Anyone from Omaha will laugh their asses off when they read what you want to keep there. Omaha is de facto segregated via Dodge Street and has been for over 90 years, so claiming North Omaha has a "diverse" culture is wrong - (accuracy & verifibility policy). An "urban center" is a central city in a nation, for example, Yaounder is an urban center of the nation of Cameroon. The term does not apply within cities themselves (accuracy policy). And "progressive community"? That is purely POV that would be debated by anyone living in Omaha, included a lot of residents of North Omaha - (NPOV & weasel word policy). Have I spelled it out clear enough?Equinox137 02:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is probably the best referenced article of any on Omaha. I punched up the lead to get to the notable stuff about the neighborhood and try to avoid the citation requests. You can revert back if you wish. It is definitely a neighborhood. It is not a community. It is within the legal city limits of Omaha. The community sent me scurrying to check all this out as I thought it was independent from reading how it originally. I am writing from NYC. There are neighborhoods here (e.g., Harlem, et al) that have individual streets with individual characters. The little subdivision are merely components of the neighborhood. Again, thanks for the effort to really improve the article. It's even more interesting than when I first saw it! Americasroof 04:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• With some general clean-up and some more illustrations, this would be a good candidate for a Featured Article. My compliments to everyone who has worked on this great portrait of North Omaha. ObtuseAngle 03:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New topic at the East Omaha talk page: Is East Omaha part of North Omaha? It extended from a discussion about the recent firebombing in that neighborhood. - Freechild 14:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What in particular would you like to have photographs of? I live in the area and could try to any type of photos requested. Dolph72 20:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great to get photos of the landmarks. Here's some other ideas:

• The new plaza next to the Jewell Bdlg
• A shot of what's left of the old storefronts along 24th, around Lake and whatnot.
• I'm especially interested in what's left of the intersection of 24th and Ames Ave and Saratoga Elementary, and any other relics leftover from the old Saratoga.
• The redevelopment area on top of where the Logan Fontenelle Projects were.
• Kountze Park, as it stands today.
• You could take some shots of anything in the NO Info Box.
• Metro Community College on Fort (historic landmark)
• Hummel Park/ Niel Woods/Fontanelle Forest
• Birthplace of Malcolm X
• Hope Center

Thanks for putting this out there - that's generous. - Freechild 20:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where and how should I upload the pictures I have? I have a few buildings as well as several info plaques from the State of Nebraska Dolph72 21:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Images should tell you everything you need to know. - Freechild 21:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have begun the upload process...see if there is anything you may want to use Dolph72 21:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, where do I look? - Freechild 22:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I kinda was hoping you knew...I uploaded them into Wikipedia Commons but they arent linked to anything. And when I click on ANYTHING on the Commons site its giving me a MySQL error. The easiest way to look at them in the short term is to start with this http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:P3160005.JPG and change the last numbers. Hopefully I can organize them into at least the main Omaha page soon. Dolph72 22:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. That picture alone primes me to write that article... I just finished Great Plains Black Museum (thanks User:Smmurphy), including a section on the building itself. It would be great to add a shot of that, especially considering its condition. I'll work on learning the picture posting later. - Freechild 01:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section is confusing because in the narrative below, it includes only the numbers for African Americans, and says they are the largest minority in Omaha. It would be useful to have the numbers for Latinos there, too, and population for Omaha overall, especially as other related articles make much of the proposal for separate school districts.--Parkwells (talk) 22:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd also like to add something to the subject of demographics. The beginning of the article states:

"diverse racial and socio-economic composition". This seems like a false statement considering a majority of blacks live in the North Omaha, area. --Jameson (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

According to the demographics section, North Omaha is 59% African-American, 29% White, 5% Hispanic and 7% other. That appears relatively diverse, compared to the rest of Omaha, which is 78% White. • Freechild'sup? 19:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The composition of North Omaha's population and comparison to overall Omaha, should be noted earlier in the article, as you suggest the media is racist in its descriptions. Simply describe the inaccuracy between TV account of 71% and the reality of 59% African American, for instance. Also, you need to separate perceptions from fact - if there is older housing there and longer to walk to stores, that's reality. If crime is higher there than in other neighborhoods, that is also reality, even if most residents are never involved in crime. High crime is what causes many people to label a neighborhood as "bad" or "iffy".

You mention Ernie Chambers' proposal for three school systems, but not why he proposed it. What did he think it would accomplish? It sounds unusual for someone of his background because of concerns about de facto segregation (here is where the actual proportions of population in North Omaha and other two areas should be shown, too). Did he think the school systems would get better funding from the state individually? More attention/resources? Why did the state legislature support it? Why are other groups opposing the proposal? Issues of schools are too important just to sit there without further explanation.--Parkwells (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You note the party affiliations of national representatives to Congress and the governor, but not for those in other state offices.--Parkwells (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Geology section describes geography, not geology, although some discussion of water features is present. That would actually fall under hydrology or hydrogeology if any facts were presented. I'd lean toward Geography for this section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.63.125.246 (talk) 20:40, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• NW Corner of 24th & Lake Streets; North Omaha.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]