This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Nickelodeon High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as High-importance). Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Animation: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Film: Filmmaking This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force. California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

For some reason, United Plankton Pictures inc. redirects to Stephen Hillenburg for me, instead of to United Plankton Pictures.
--Nicky Nouse (talk) 07:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A change was made to the history of Nickelodeon Animation Studios. Could someone verify if the change is accurate? If it isn't, please revert to the prior version. 96.233.67.6 (talk) 12:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There used to be a picture of the studio in the article. Why was it removed? Ual123 (talk) 23:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody know how many Nicktoons were made by Nickelodeon Animation Studios (previously known as Games Animation) and not by studios like Klasky-Csupo, Spumco, Jumbo Pictures, Frederator, O Entertainment, and DNA Productions because they were not made by Nickelodeon Animation Studios? I know The Ren and Stimpy Show (when John K. and Spumco got fired), Rocko's Modern Life, Hey Arnold!, The Angry Beavers, CatDog, SpongeBob SquarePants, Invader ZiM, Catscratch, and The Mighty B! were made by Nickelodeon Animation Studios. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.95.34.84 (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Nickelodeon Animation Studio's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "BOM":

• From Barnyard (film): "Barnyard: The Original Party Animals". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved November 17, 2012.
• From The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie: "The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie (2004)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved July 20, 2009.
• From The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water: "The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water (2015)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved February 8, 2015.
• From Nickelodeon Movies: "Box Office Mojo - Rugrats in Paris: The Movie". www.BoxOfficeMojo.com. IMDb.com Inc. Archived from the original on April 1, 2014. Retrieved June 17, 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The credits for Charlotte's Web 2: Wilbur's Great Adventure does say Production Services Provided by Nickelodeon Animation Studios, Inc., which is in turn, Nickelodeon Animation Studio, so does it count in the NAS article? On a "by the way"/P.S. note, the film also credits Nick Animation (Nickelodeon Animation Studio) under Voice Recording Facilities with Salami Studios and Hacienda Post and the copyright also being credited to Paramount Pictures Corporation and Universal Studios. CARS FOR ME (talk) 14:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the source that indicates the Proud Family pilot was made by or for Nickelodeon?, because that show was greenlited by Disney, and there's no official source that indicates that pilot was made for Nickelodeon, I don't know but ago a year, other shows that were greenlited by Cartoon Network and Disney were listed on the unsucceful pilots section, and that was false info, please, anyone can source that the Proud Family was initially made first for Nick before Disney picked up? --181.134.245.94 (talk) 00:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was a source provided at The Proud Family. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think the production tables are becoming too long for a single article. There will be more Nickelodeon animated projects to come, so it should be a separate article now. Especially since the studio occasionally produces for different sister platforms. MegaSmike46 (talk) 23:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I recently split up ExxonMobil and History of ExxonMobil for a very similar reason. It's not as big as Exxon's case in terms of article size, but a split would be EXTREMELY useful. InvadingInvader (talk) 19:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @FunhausFrank I’m the assistant of @WaxworkerPlease put back games animation because @Waxworker likes the idea I’m going to fix it if you remove it again I’m afraid I’m going to block your account now stop! 173.68.84.93 (talk) 15:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about, but threatening to block people isn't a good look. Waxworker (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even though Games Productions/Animation was publicly "rebranded" after the new Nickelodeon Animation Studio building was opened, the company name (Games Productions) still exists according to Viacom/Paramount company filings: https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_ny/1227249 There is also a filing for "New Games Productions Inc." that seems to be used for the studio's New York office: https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_ca/3087473 Given that these sources show the company name is still "active," we should avoid saying that Games went defunct or anything like that. FunhausFrank (talk) 00:13, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]