This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Education Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. English Language This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Should we mention the similar Oxford 3000 (https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/about/oxford3000; https://www.mondly.com/blog/oxford-3000-most-important-words-english/), which also is a list of most common words slightly modified to include a few words that are of special interest to English-language learners but are not so common in general material ("passport" -- not present in the NGSL -- is one mentioned for the 3000, as is "apple," which is in the NAWL). At the moment the Oxford 3000 does not have a Wikipedia entry. Kdammers (talk) 00:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, we should not mention similar topics. Veverve (talk) 09:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a Wikipedia policy on this? I have seen linking to similar topics on other pages. Are those linkings a violation of policy?Kdammers (talk) 18:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to related WP articles in a WP:SEEALSO section is different from going WP:OFFTOPIC. Veverve (talk) 20:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]